European Journal of Policing Studies

Article

Different ways of acting and different ways of knowing? The cultures of policeacademic partnerships in a multi-site and multi-force study

Keywords police-academic partnerships, culture, police-citizen relations
Authors Alan Greene en Layla Skinns
DOI
Author's information

Alan Greene
Alan Greene retired from the police in 2015. He was previously a Superintendent in GMP holding a variety of posts in uniform services. Whilst at GMP he was also head of Custody for three years (2011-14) and worked for Assistant Chief Constable Dawn Copley when she held the national custody portfolio. He was also Chair of the Police Superintendents’ Association in GMP.

Layla Skinns
Layla Skinns is a Reader in Criminology, School of Law, University of Sheffield. She previously worked at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge where she also completed her MPhil and PhD. Her main research interests are police authority, discretion and governance in police custody. She is currently the PI on an ESRC-funded study of ‘good’ police custody (corresp: L.Skinns@sheffield.ac.uk).
  • Abstract

      The purpose of this paper is to add to the growing body of literature on police-academic partnerships, which has emerged over the last thirty years. Using a multi-force and multi-site study of ‘good’ police custody practices, as a case study, we examine the cultures of police-academic partnerships through the concepts of “ways of acting” and “ways of knowing” (Canter, 2004). In terms of ways of acting, we examine differences that arose whilst forming police-academic relationships and accessing multiple forces and custody facilities. In terms of ways of knowing, we examine differences in academic and police theorization about police-citizen relationships. It is argued that different ways of acting – rooted in the cultural, but also organisational and structural contexts of policing and academia – created challenges for the research and for police-academic relationships. By contrast, different ways of knowing contributed to helpful synergies between the two authors, helping the police author to see his work anew and aiding the academic author with the theorization process. One of the key lessons from this case study is that theory development should be seen as foundational to, and as strengthening of, police-academic partnerships.

Please sign in to access the article



Did you receive an activation code but no access yet? Please activate your code here.

Forgot your password? Request new password.

Purchase access

You can purchase online access to this article. You will receive 24 hrs access @ € 17,50 (excl. VAT).

24 hrs access € 17,50 (excl. VAT)

Activate your code

If you have an access code, please activate it here.