Particracy has been widely used to describe Belgian politics after World War II. Yet, Belgian politics has changed. We examine five changes – the federalisation of the state architecture, diversification of the demos, erosion of political support, party’s dealignment and personalisation of politics – to evaluate how they have affected particracy in Belgium. The answer is twofold: particracy is still very strong, but it has changed. The three traditional party families that had institutionalised particracy in Belgium (Christian-democrats, socialists and liberals) had to face new challengers. They co-opted the most moderate ones (greens, regionalists), while excluding others (radical right/left). Intraparty democracy/participatory/transparency reforms, or changes to the electoral system, all of them opening the political system, were also implemented, but parties were able to overcome them. Yet, the ever-growing gap between traditional parties and citizens and the growth of new parties building upon voters’ dissatisfaction with traditional parties, may put particracy more radically into question. |


Res Publica
About this journalSubscribe to the email alerts for this journal here to receive notifications when a new issue is at your disposal.
Introduction |
|
Authors | Karel Van Nieuwenhuyse, Stefaan Fiers and Frederik Verleden |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Keywords | dealignment, electoral support, federalism, gender, particracy, personalisation |
Authors | Jean-Benoit Pilet and Petra Meier |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
|
Keywords | mediatisation, particracy, media logic |
Authors | Peter Van Aelst |
AbstractAuthor's information |
There is a growing consensus that politics have become mediatised. News media have become more independent and are more guided by their own routines and standards and less by what political actors deem important. However, this paper argues that this has not led to a decrease of the power of political parties. In Belgium, particracy and mediatisation seem to go hand in hand. There are mainly two reasons for this. Firstly, media attention focuses heavily on politicians with power and in that sense, media logic and party logic overlap. Secondly, parties have adjusted well to the media and their logic, among others by integrating journalists in the party organisation. We expect that social media will gradually become more important for politicians, but that this evolution too will change little to the central position of political parties in our democracy. |
Essay |
|
Authors | Wilfried Dewachter |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Kris Deschouwer |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Stefaan Walgrave |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Marc Hooghe |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Bart Maddens |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Carl Devos |
Author's information |
Symposium |
|
Authors | Joop van Holsteyn |
Author's information |
Research Note |
|
Authors | Bert Fraussen and Darren Halpin |
Author's information |
Research Note |
|
Authors | Daan Fonck and Yf Reykers |
Author's information |