GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001031

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

ECJ Court Watch

Case C-539/15. Age Discrimination

Daniel Bowman –v– Pensionsversicherungsanstalt, reference lodged by the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof on 15 October 2015

Keywords age discrimination
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-539/15. Age Discrimination", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2016):71-71

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Is Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in conjunction with Article 2(1) and (2) and Article 6 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC, 1 and also having regard to Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be interpreted as meaning that

      1. a provision in a collective agreement which provides for a longer period for incremental advancement for employment at the start of a career, thereby making it more difficult to advance to the next salary step, constitutes an indirect difference in treatment based on age,

      2. and, if such is the case, that such a rule is appropriate and necessary in the light of the limited professional experience at the start of a career?


Print this article