GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001003035

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

ECJ Court Watch

Case C-175/16. Working time

Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik – v – SOS-Lapsikylä ry, reference lodged by the Finnish Korkein oikeus on 29 March 2016

Keywords Working time
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-175/16. Working time", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2016):213-213

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Must Article 17(1) of Directive 2003/88 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as including within its scope an activity, as described above, performed in a children’s home in which the worker acts as the representative of foster parents of children in care on the parents’ days off, lives during this period with the children in a family-like setting and during this time independently attends equally to the children’s and family’s needs, as parents generally do?


Print this article