GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001004030

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

ECJ Court Watch

Case C-429/16. Collecive redundancy

Małgorzata Ciupa and Others – v – II Szpital Miejski im. L. Rydygiera w Łodzi, now Szpital Ginekologiczno-Położniczy im dr L. Rydygiera Sp. z o.o. w Łodzi, reference lodged by the Polish Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi on 2 August 2016

Keywords Collective redundancy
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-429/16. Collecive redundancy", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2016):272-273

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Is Article 2 of Directive 98/59 to be interpreted as meaning that an employer employing at least 20 employees who intends to give notice of termination of contractual conditions in relation to a number of employees, as provided for in Article 1(1) of the Law of 13 March 2003 laying down special rules on terminating employment relationships with employees for reasons unrelated to the employees (Ustawa o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników, Dz. U. 2003, No 90, item 844, as amended), is required to use the procedures specified in Articles 2, 3, 4 and 6 of that law? That is, does that obligation apply in the case of the following articles:

      1. Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 241(2) 8 and Article 23 1 of the Labour Code (Kodeks pracy);

      2. Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 77(5) 2 or Article 241(1) 7 of the Labour Code;

      3. Article 42(1) of the Labour Code in conjunction with Article 45(1) of the Labour Code?


Print this article