GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072017002002023

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

ECJ Court Watch

Case C-653/16. Discrimination

Jitka Svobodová v Česká republika – Okresní soud v Náchodě, reference lodged by the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) on 19 December 2016

DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-653/16. Discrimination", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2017):114-114

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Does the Czech legislation under which judges are not entitled to remuneration for on-call duty, even though other employees (in the public and private sectors) are entitled to that remuneration on the basis of the Zákoník práce (Labour Code) or other provisions of law, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78?

      Does the Czech legislation under which all judges (according to the number of years credited) are entitled to the same salary, even though they perform different numbers of hours of on-call duty, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78?


Print this article