GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072017002003001

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Editorial

Future of Europe

DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Future of Europe", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2017):119-119

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      When writing this editorial, Juncker’s State of the Union which takes place on 13 September still has to follow. I reckon there will be some optimism in his speech, as both France and Germany are following an EU-minded course and the economy overall is doing well. Having said that, there are still major issues that need to be resolved in the EU arena, such as migration, terrorism, Brexit and Euro-scepticism.

      How these (and other) issues are going to be resolved, and which direction the EU will go in, is, in the meantime, far from clear. The white paper on the Future of Europe of 1 March 2017 presents five scenarios regarding that direction: (i) carrying on, (ii) nothing but the single market, (iii) those who want more do more, (iv) doing less more efficiently and (v) doing much more together. Choices made about all this will certainly impact the course of the social dimension of Europe, and therefore our day-to-day legal practice. This is explained in some detail by the Commission in its reflection paper on the social dimension of Europe of 26 April 2017. Although these choices will undoubtedly affect employers and employees throughout the entire EU, in the Netherlands at least, this paper seems not to have held the attention of the public at all, and was rarely discussed.

      In contrast, a hot topic in the Netherlands was the Smallsteps case. The ECJ ruled that a so-called ‘pre-pack’ procedure is fully governed by the Acquired Rights Directive, therefore including Articles 3 and 4. That will quite likely spell the end of a highly controversial Dutch practice and a draft statute in order to give the pre-pack a legal basis.
      The above already shows that EU law matters in practice. Once again, case reports in this magazine should that this is particularly true where it comes to equal treatment. No fewer than five cases are about this topic. The Irish court, for example, answered the interesting question of whether or not a policy requiring employees to speak English in the workplace constitutes discrimination grounds of national origin. Not only fundamental rights, but also much more commonplace topics such as leave entitlements require the national courts to consider the proper interpretation of EU law – meaning that this magazine contains something for everyone. Enjoy!

      Zef Even, editor


Print this article