Must clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP which forms part of the Community legal order by virtue of Council Directive 1999/70 1 be interpreted as meaning that termination of a temporary ‘contrato de interinidad’ to cover a vacancy when the term for which the contract was concluded by the employer and the worker expires constitutes objective grounds justifying the Spanish legislature’s not providing in such a case for any compensation whatsoever for the termination of the contract, whereas compensation of 20 days’ pay for every year of service is provided for in the case of a comparable permanent worker dismissed on objective grounds?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072017002003024
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| ECJ Court Watch | Case C-677/16. Fixed-term workLucía Montero Mateos – v – Agencia Madrileña de Atención Social de la Consejería de Políticas Sociales y Familia de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, reference lodged by the Spanish Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid on 29 December 2016 |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072017002003024 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "Case C-677/16. Fixed-term work", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2017):182-182
, "Case C-677/16. Fixed-term work", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2017):182-182