GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072017002003036

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

ECJ Court Watch

Case C-252/17. Equal treatment

Moisés Vadillo González – v – Alestis Aerospace, S.L., reference lodged by the Spanish Juzgado de lo Social No 2, Cádiz on 12 May 2017

DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-252/17. Equal treatment", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2017):186-187

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Does Directive 2010/18/EU 1 preclude an interpretation of Article 37.4 ET (leave of absence of an hour every day until the child reaches nine months of age) to the effect that, regardless of the sex of either parent, such leave is not be granted to the person applying for it if the other parent is unemployed?

      Does Article 3 of Directive 2006/54/EC, 2 which seeks to guarantee full equality between men and women in their working lives, preclude an interpretation of the said Article 37.4 ET to the effect that, if the male parent is working, he has no entitlement to such leave if his wife and fellow parent is unemployed?


Print this article