GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004001027

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Rulings

ECJ 14 March 2019, case C-134/18 (Vester), Social insurance

Maria Vester – v – Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering, Belgian case

Keywords Social insurance
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Abstract Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 14 March 2019, case C-134/18 (Vester), Social insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2019):65-65

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

    • Summary

      A migrant worker who has been granted invalidity status by the Member State of his residence while he is not entitled to receive invalidity benefits, cannot be required by the Member State in which he completed his insurance periods to complete an additional one-year period of incapacity to work in order to be granted invalidity status there, and receive invalidity benefits, without receiving any benefits for incapacity to work during that period.

    • Question

      Must Articles 45 and 48 TFEU be interpreted as precluding a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a worker who, after a one-year period of incapacity to work, is granted invalidity status by the competent institution of the Member State in which he resides without being entitled to invalidity benefits on the basis of the legislation of that Member State, is required, by the competent institution of the Member State in which he completed all his insurance periods, to complete an additional one-year period of incapacity to work in order to be granted invalidity status and entitlement to pro-rata invalidity benefits, without, however, receiving any invalidity benefits during that period.

    • Ruling

      Articles 45 and 48 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a worker who is unfit to work for one year and who has been granted invalidity status by the competent institution of the Member State of his residence, without being entitled to receive invalidity benefits on the basis of the law of that Member State, is required by the competent institution of the Member State in which he completed all his insurance periods to complete an additional one-year period of incapacity to work in order to be granted invalidity status and receive pro-rata invalidity benefits, without receiving any benefits for incapacity to work during that period.


Print this article