-
Summary
In its consideration of Ms Hebberecht’s request to extend her posting, EEAS could not exclude equal treatment aspects from the consideration on grounds that they were not deemed relevant in the interests of the service.
-
Order
The Court (Fourth Chamber):
Dismisses the appeal;
Orders the EEAS to bear its own costs.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005004024
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 19 November 2020, Case C-93/19 P (EEAS – v – Hebberecht), Gender Discrimination, MiscellaneousEuropean External Action Service (EEAS) – v – Chantal Hebberecht, EU case |
Keywords | Gender Discrimination, Miscellaneous |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072020005004024 |
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 19 November 2020, Case C-93/19 P (EEAS – v – Hebberecht), Gender Discrimination, Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2020):281-281
, "ECJ 19 November 2020, Case C-93/19 P (EEAS – v – Hebberecht), Gender Discrimination, Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2020):281-281
In its consideration of Ms Hebberecht’s request to extend her posting, EEAS could not exclude equal treatment aspects from the consideration on grounds that they were not deemed relevant in the interests of the service. |
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Contents