-
Summary
Requiring a minimum pension amount for allowing early retirement is not contrary to Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 even if it puts female workers at a particular disadvantage, provided that this is justified by legitimate reasons of social policy which are not related to gender discrimination.
Unfortunately, no English translation of this judgment is available yet. Other language versions are available on:
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/fiche.jsf?id=C%3B843%3B19%3BRP%3B1%3BP%3B1%3BC2019%2F0843%2FP&oqp=&for=&mat=or&lgrec=en&jge=&td=%3BALL&jur=C%2CT%2CF&num=843%252F19&dates=&pcs=Oor&lg=&pro=&nat=or&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&language=en&avg=&cid=871254
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006001021
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Rulings | ECJ 21 January 2021, C-843/19 (INSS), Gender Discrimination, PensionInstituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) – v – BT |
| Keywords | Gender Discrimination, Pension |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006001021 |
|
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
| This article has been viewed times. |
| This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 21 January 2021, C-843/19 (INSS), Gender Discrimination, Pension", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2021):68-68
, "ECJ 21 January 2021, C-843/19 (INSS), Gender Discrimination, Pension", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2021):68-68
|
Requiring a minimum pension amount for allowing early retirement is not contrary to Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 even if it puts female workers at a particular disadvantage, provided that this is justified by legitimate reasons of social policy which are not related to gender discrimination. |