GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007002030

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Cases C-190/22, Paid Leave

FI – v – Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, reference lodged by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) on 11 March 2022

Keywords Paid Leave
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Cases C-190/22, Paid Leave", European Employment Law Cases, 2, (2022):114-114

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      • Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude an interpretation of a rule of national law such as Paragraph 7(3) of the German Bundesurlaubsgesetz (Federal Law on Leave; ‘the BUrIG’) according to which a worker’s entitlement to paid annual leave acquired during the work phase of a progressive retirement relationship but as yet unexercised is forfeited in the release phase at the end of the holiday year or at a later time?

      • Should the Court of Justice answer Question 1 in the negative: Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude an interpretation of a rule of national law such as Paragraph 7(3) BUrlG according to which the as yet unexercised entitlement to paid annual leave of a worker who, in the course of the holiday year, moves from the work phase to the release phase is forfeited at the end of the holiday year or at a later time if the employer – without having previously fulfilled its obligations to cooperate in the realisation of the leave entitlement – has granted the worker the entire annual leave in line with his or her application for a period immediately prior to the start of the release phase, but the leave entitlement could not be fulfilled – at least in part – because the worker became unfit for work due to illness after the leave was granted?


Print this article