GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

Search articles of European Employment Law Cases
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007003020

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open
Rulings

ECJ 15 September 2022, case C-58/21 (Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien), Social insurance, pension

FK – v – Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien, Austrian case
Keywords Social insurance, Pension, Juridisch, Arbeidsrecht, Europees recht (EU Recht)
DOI 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007003020
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Abstract Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 15 September 2022, case C-58/21 (Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien), Social insurance, pension", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2022):155-156
Download RIS Download BibTex

    The conflict rules in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 are not applicable when a person who resides in one Member State where the centre of interests of his or her activities is also situated, whilst pursuing an activity in two other Member States. Furthermore, EU law precludes national legislation which makes the award of an early retirement pension applied for conditional on the waiver by the person concerned of the right to practice as a lawyer, without taking into account, in particular, the Member State in which the activity concerned is pursued.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

    • Summary

      The conflict rules in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 are not applicable when a person who resides in one Member State where the centre of interests of his or her activities is also situated, whilst pursuing an activity in two other Member States. Furthermore, EU law precludes national legislation which makes the award of an early retirement pension applied for conditional on the waiver by the person concerned of the right to practice as a lawyer, without taking into account, in particular, the Member State in which the activity concerned is pursued.

    • Questions

      1. Which legislation is applicable under Article 13(2)(b) of Regulation No 883/2004 where the place of residence and the centre of interest of the activities of the person concerned are situated in Switzerland and that person also pursues an activity – which is distributed unevenly – in two other Member States, within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Annex II to the EC-Switzerland Agreement, namely in Germany and Austria?

      2. Must EU law be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the award of an early retirement pension applied for conditional on the waiver by the person concerned of the right to practice as a lawyer not only in the territory of the Member State concerned but also abroad?

    • Ruling

      1. The conflict rules laid down in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems are not applicable to the situation of a person who resides in the Member State in which the centre of interests of his or her activities is also situated, whilst pursuing an activity – which is distributed unevenly – in two other Member States, where it is necessary to determine whether that person has direct rights vis-à-vis the institutions of one of those two other Member States by virtue of contributions paid during a given period.

      2. Articles 45 and 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the award of an early retirement pension applied for conditional on the waiver by the person concerned of the right to practise as a lawyer, without taking into account, in particular, the Member State in which the activity concerned is pursued.


Print this article
Contents