-
Summary
A national provision which, as applied in domestic case law, results in a higher salary for persons who entered into service before that provision cafe into force, does not constitute age discrimination. Moreover, Directive 2000/78 only protects the grounds mentioned in Article 1 of that Directive. Unfortunately, no English translation of the case is available. Other language versions are available on https://curia.europa.eu/juris/fiche.jsf?nat=or&mat=or&pcs=Oor&jur=C%2CT%2CF&num=301%252F21&for=&jge=&dates=&language=en&pro=&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&oqp=&td=%3BALL&avg=&lgrec=nl&id=C%3B301%3B21%3BRP%3B1%3BP%3B1%3BC2021%2F0301%2FJ&lg=&cid=347214.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007004018
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 20 October 2022, case C-301/21 (Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others), Age DiscriminationCurtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others – v – YF and Others, Romanian Case |
Keywords | Age Discrimination |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007004018 |
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 20 October 2022, case C-301/21 (Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others), Age Discrimination", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2022):205-205
, "ECJ 20 October 2022, case C-301/21 (Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others), Age Discrimination", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2022):205-205
A national provision which, as applied in domestic case law, results in a higher salary for persons who entered into service before that provision cafe into force, does not constitute age discrimination. Moreover, Directive 2000/78 only protects the grounds mentioned in Article 1 of that Directive. |