GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007004037

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Case C-650/22, Other Forms of Free Movement

Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) – v – BZ, reference lodged by the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) on 17 October 2022

Keywords Other Forms of Free Movement
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-650/22, Other Forms of Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2022):212-212

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      Are Articles 45 and 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding:

      • the principle that the player and the club wishing to employ him are jointly and severally liable in respect of the compensation due to the club whose contract with the player has been terminated without just cause, as stipulated in Article 17.2 of the FIFA RSTP, in conjunction with the sporting sanctions provided for in Article 17.4 of those regulations and the financial sanctions provided for in Article 17.1;

      • the ability of the association to which the player’s former club belongs not to deliver the international transfer certificate required if the player is to be employed by a new club, where there is a dispute between that former club and the player (Article 9.1 of the RSTP and Article 8.2.7 of Annex 3 to the RSTP)?


Print this article