GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072022007004038

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Case C-673/22, Parental Leave

C.C.C. – v – Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), reference lodged by the Juzgado de lo Social n.º 1 de Sevilla (Spain) on 27 October 2022

Keywords Parental Leave
DOI
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-673/22, Parental Leave", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2022):212-213

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Is the omission by the Spanish legislature from Article 48(2) of the Consolidated Text of the Law on the Workers’ Statute (Texto Refundido de la Ley del Estatuto de los Trabajadores) and from Articles 177, 178 and 179 of the Consolidated Text of the General Law on Social Security (Texto Refundido de la Ley General de la Seguridad Social) of provisions requiring an assessment of the specific needs of single-parent families in the area of work-life balance, having implications for the period in which care is provided to a new-born child, as compared with a child born into a two-parent family in which both parents have an expectation of access to paid leave if both fulfil the conditions of access to the social security benefit, compatible with the Directive, which requires a specific assessment, inter alia, of the birth of a child into a single-parent family, in order to determine the conditions of access to and the detailed arrangements for parental leave?

      2. In the absence of a specific statutory provision laid down by the Spanish legislature, must the eligibility conditions for time off work for the birth of a child, the conditions of access to the social security cash benefit and the rules governing eligibility for parental leave, and, in particular, the possible extension of the duration of that leave owing to the lack of another parent other than the biological mother who cares for the child, be interpreted flexibly pursuant to the Community provision?


Print this article