GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

Search articles of European Employment Law Cases
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008004018

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open
Rulings

ECJ 30 November 2023, case C-270/22 (Ministero dell’Instruzione en INPS), Fixed-Term Work

G.D., A.R., C.M. – v – Ministero dell’Instruzione, Instituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS), Italian case
Keywords Fixed-term Work
DOI 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008004018
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Abstract Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 30 November 2023, case C-270/22 (Ministero dell’Instruzione en INPS), Fixed-Term Work", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2023):194-194
Download RIS Download BibTex

    National legislation which, for the purposes of recognizing the length of service of a worker upon his or her establishment in employment, excludes periods of service completed under fixed-term employment contracts that do not amount to 180 per academic year, exceeds what is necessary and is thereby precluded by clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

    • Summary

      National legislation which, for the purposes of recognizing the length of service of a worker upon his or her establishment in employment, excludes periods of service completed under fixed-term employment contracts that do not amount to 180 per academic year, exceeds what is necessary and is thereby precluded by clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work.

    • Question

      Must clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, for the purposes of recognising the length of service of a worker upon his or her employment as a career civil servant, excludes periods of service completed under fixed-term employment contracts that do not amount to 180 days per academic year or are not carried out continuously between 1 February and the end of the final assessment of the pupils, irrespective of the actual number of hours worked, and limits to two thirds periods of service reaching those thresholds beyond four years, subject to the reinstatement of the remaining third after a certain number of years of service?

    • Ruling

      Clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, for the purposes of recognising the length of service of a worker upon his or her establishment in employment as a career civil servant, excludes periods of service completed under fixed-term employment contracts that do not amount to 180 days per academic year or that are not carried out continuously between 1 February and the end of the final assessment of the pupils, irrespective of the actual number of hours worked, and which limits to two thirds the taking into account of periods of service reaching those thresholds beyond four years, subject to reinstatement of the remaining third after a certain number of years of service.


Print this article
Contents