- Issue 1 2002
- Editorial Editorial: The Future of International Civil Procedure Law
- Article The Integrating Effect of European Civil Procedure Law
- Article The Brussels Convention Successful Model and Old-timer
- Article The New International Procedure in Matrimonial Matters in Europe
- Article Lis Pendens and Related Actions
- Article Lis Alibi Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens: From Confrontation via Co-ordination to Collaboration
- Article Human Rights and Jurisdiction: General Observations and Impact on the Doctrines of Forum Non Conveniens and Forum Conveniens
- Article The Lugano Convention and Its Relevance for Arbitration
- Article Hungary and the Lugano Convention
- Article EU Enlargement: Aspects of (International) Procedural Law
- Article The Internet and Jurisdiction Based on Contracts
- Article Place of Performance-Jurisdiction and Plaintiffs Interests in Contempory Societies
- Article Jurisdiction Based on ‘Business Activities’ in the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters
- Article The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments: Where We Are and the Road Ahead
- Book Review Klaus Peter Berger (ed.), The Practice of Transnational Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International (2001), pp. i-xiv and 1-228
- Book Review Jan Ramberg, International Commercial Transactions, 2nd ed., Paris: ICC Publishing SA (2000), pp. 1-516
- Book Review Paul J. Omar (ed.), Procedures to Enforce Foreign Judgments, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co./Ashgate Publishing Ltd. (2002), pp. i-xiv and 1-118
- Book Review Gerhard Walter/Samuel P. Baumgartner (eds.), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions, The Hague: Kluwer Law International (2000), pp. i-xii and 1-580
European Journal of Law Reform |
|
| Article | The Lugano Convention and Its Relevance for Arbitration |
| Authors | Laurent Killias |
| Author's information |
Laurent Killias Dr. iur., LL.M., attorney-at-law, Zurich. This article is adapted from a paper presented at the international symposium on ‘Zukunft des internationalen Verfahrensrechts’ held in Basel on 7-8 June 2001 under the auspices of the University of Basel. The author wishes to thank Dr. Paolo Michele Patocchi, LL.M., attorney-at-law, Geneva, for his observations and critical review. |