-
Abstract
This article examines the concept of judicial activism in relation to the courts’ role of interpreting legislation, particularly focusing on the courts’ function of interpreting the Constitution. It specifically examines modes of constitutional interpretation obtaining in RSA and Nigeria, by focusing on selected judicial decisions by superior courts in the two countries. It also examines constitutional provisions governing the interpretation of the Constitution (Bill of Rights) and legislation as provided for in the Constitution of RSA and that of Nigeria. It also makes a comparative examination of judicial approaches to the interpretation of socio-economic rights enshrined in the Constitution of each of the two countries, specifically focusing on the rights to health and housing.The article observes that the concept of judicial activism is a necessary tool for attaining justice and achieving social transformation.
European Journal of Law Reform |
|
Artikel | Judicial ActivismUsurpation of Parliament’s and Executive’s Legislative Functions, or a Quest for Justice and Social Transformation |
Keywords | judicial activism, separation of powers, constitutional interpretation |
Authors | Reyneck Matemba |
Author's information |