-
Abstract
In this article a consecutive comparison will be made between the approaches taken towards wrongful birth and wrongful life cases in the Netherlands and in England and Wales. The systems will be evaluated in the light of the best interests of the child, the balance struck between all moral convictions involved, and legal fairness. It will be argued that the approach taken in the Netherlands is more favourable in most respects, but could improve the balance between all moral convictions involved and could enhance legal fairness by limiting the claim for material damages to costs associated with the disability of the child.
European Journal of Law Reform |
|
Artikel | Wrongful Testing and Its Lively Consequences |
Keywords | wrongful life, wrongful birth, comparative law, best interests of the child, balancing convictions |
Authors | W.Th. Nuninga |
Author's information |