Enrico Albanesi Lecturer in Constitutional Law at the University of Genoa (Italy) and Associate Research Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS), University of London. Co-leader of the IALS Law Reform Project.
Citaties in dit artikel
English
Fusaro, ‘Bicameralism in Italy. 150 of Poor Design, Disappointing Performances, Aborted Reforms’, 2013. Available at: <www.carlofusaro.it/in_english/Bicameralism_in_ITA_2013.pdf> (last accessed , 2017
CarnevaleLupo, Zaccaria
La delega “taglialeggi”: i passi compiuti e i problemi da sciogliere. Atti del seminario svoltosi alla Luiss “Guido Carli” il 1° aprile 2008 , 2008
Oliver
Improving the Scrutiny of Bills: The Case for Standards and Checklists
Public Law , 2006
Hazell
Time for a New Convention: Parliamentary Scrutiny of Constitutional Bills 1997-2005
Public Law , 2006
Constitution-Amendment
Bill in the Senato (A.S. 1429). The bill was amended and passed by the Senato , 2014
Download citeerwijze bij dit artikel
Onderwerpen
Juridisch > Staatsrecht
Samenvatting
The aim of this article is to describe the mechanisms that are used in the civil law system to review existing legislation. The case study will be based on the Italian system. In the civil law system we are not familiar with the concept of law reform, in the sense used in the common law system, because there is no law reform agency in the civil law world. The mechanisms used to review the existing law in civil law systems are: codification, consolidation, repeal, law revision and legal restatement. To understand how the mechanisms used to review existing legislation work in Italy, an overview of the Italian law-making and drafting processes will be carried out here, underlying the bad impact that the Italian equal bicameralism has on the quality of legislation and also on the mechanisms to review existing legislation. After this, the article will focus on the specific tools that are used in Italy for codification and consolidation (decreti legislativi), for law revision (the so-called taglia-leggi) and for legal restatement (examining the role of the Consiglio di Stato). Particular attention will also be paid to the parliamentary scrutiny on the quality of legislation. Finally, the article will focus on the constitutional amendment process Italy carried out in 2014-2016 and that was expected to fundamentally change the Italian law-making process, superseding the equal bicameralism arrangement (a referendum on this was held on 4 December 2016, and the reform was rejected by the Italian people).
U heeft geen toegang tot deze publicatie Beste bezoeker, om de inhoud te raadplegen heeft u een abonnement nodig op deze publicatie of de collectie waar deze publicatie deel van uitmaakt. Neem contact op met klantenservice@boomportaal.nl voor meer informatie over de mogelijkheden en prijzen.
Kopen in de webshop Deze publicatie is ook te vinden in onze webshop. Sommige publicaties hebben ook de mogelijkheid om direct toegang te kopen tot het online boek.