Originally, Article 12 of the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure was intended as a correction mechanism for the prosecution monopoly of the Public Prosecution Service. In a later stage, the private interest of complainants (or victims) became more central. This article argues that a third function now emerges: a valve function for social dissatisfaction. The social conflicts that underly the proceedings in these socially sensitive cases give rise to new democratic legitimacy problems. However, an appropriate normative framework that captures these new democratic demands has not yet been constructed. To this end, this article provides an alternative democratic vocabulary in order to bridge the gap between empirical and normative notions of legitimacy. By means of a historical and normative analysis, it will be argued that Article 12 has an important democratic potential within the characteristically autonomous Dutch system of criminal law. |


Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy
About this journalSubscribe to the email alerts for this journal here to receive notifications when a new issue is at your disposal.
Issue Pre-publications, 2022
Expand all abstracts
Article |
|
Keywords | Article 12-procedure, principle of opportunity, liberalism, judicial activism, democratic legitimacy |
Authors | Sophie Koning |
AbstractAuthor's information |