Search result: 1472 articles

x

Christiana Dr. iur. Fountoulakis
Assistant Professor in Private Law, University of Basel

Vesna Lazic
Associate Professor at the Molengraaff Institute for Private Law, Utrecht University and a Senior Researcher at the T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague.

Fan Yang
Fan Yang, Research Fellow (MCIArb) LCIA (YIAG); PRC Representative of the Practice & Standards Committee, Arbitration Sub-Committee, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; PhD Researcher (London) LL.M. (Birmingham) LL.B. (Shanghai) Certificate in International & Comparative Law (Cornell University (USA) & Universite Paris I - Sorbonne); Barrister (England & Wales, non-practising).

Terence Sir Etherton
Chairman of the Law Commision.

William Robinson
The author is a coordinator in the Legal Revisers Group of the European Commission's Legal Service. The views expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Commission. This article focuses on the drafting processes in a standard procedure for the adoption of an EC act by the European Parliament and the Council and is far from exhaustive.

Zione Jane Veronica Ntaba
Principal State Advocate in the Ministry of Justice, Republic of Malawi. MA Student, Institute of Advanced legal Studies, University of London, 2007.

Helen Xanthaki
Senior Lecturer and Academic Director, Centre for Legislative Studies, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London; Lawyer (Athens' Bar).

Joseph G. Kobba
MA Student, Institute of Advanced legal Studies, University of London, 2007.

Alfred Kellermann
Team Leader EU Project Strengthening the Ministry of European Integration in Tirana; Legal and Policy Advisor T.M.C Asser Institute, the Hague.

Federico Ferretti
Avvocato and Lecturer, Brunel Law School, Brunel University, UK.

Ester Herlin-Karnell
Somerville College, University of Oxford. I would like to thank Stephen Weatherill and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for very helpful comments on this paper. The usual disclaimer applies. This paper was completed in March 2008.

Alfred E. Kellermann
Team Leader EU Project Strengthening the Ministry of European Integration in Tirana; Legal and Policy Advisor T.M.C Asser Institute, the Hague.

Luk Van Langenhove

Daniele Marchesi
Luk Van Langenhove, United Nations University - UNU-CRIS Bruges; Daniele Marchesi, European Commission (at the time of writing, United Nations University - UNU-CRIS Bruges). This article was presented at the international conference “The Lisbon Reform Treaty (and its rejection?): Internal and External Implications”, organized by the Hebrew University, IASEI and CAES in Jerusalem, on 12-14 July 2008.

Claudio Mandrino
Reasercher at University of Turin (Italy). This paper was first presented at the international conference on “The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications” organized by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, by the Davis Institute for International Relations and by the Israeli Association for the Study of European Integration, 13-14 July 2008.

Maya Sion-Tzidkiyahu
PhD candidate, Department of Political Science and the European Forum, and Jean Monnet Lecturer, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. I would like to thank Guy Harpaz and the anonymous readers for their useful and constructive comments. An early version of this article was presented at the conference The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications, 13-14 July 2008 in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Comments to mayasion@mscc.huji.ac.il are welcomed.

Sarah Seeger
Sarah Seeger is a researcher at the Center for Applied Policy Research (CAP) at the LMU Munich. This article is based on a paper presented at the international conference “The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications” at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 13-14 July 2008. I am grateful to Dr. Guy Harpaz, an anonymous referee, Dr. Carlos Closa and the participants of the conference for their helpful comments.

Juan Santos Vara
Associate Professor of Public International Law at the University of Salamanca (Spain). PhD in Law from the University of Salamanca, Master in European Law from the College of Europe (Bruges, Belgium) and Master in European Studies from the University Carlos III of Madrid. He has been a Visiting Fellow at the Harvard Law School, at the Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University and at the King's College London. The paper was presented at the International Conference on “The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications,” organized by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Davis Institute for International Relations and the Israeli Association for the Study of European Integration, July 13-14, 2008. The present paper has benefited from the support of the research project: “Las relaciones entre la UE y NU: hacia la defensa del multilateralismo eficaz,” DER2008-05419/JURI, financed by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

Anna-Lena Högenauer
B.A. King's College London, 2005; M.A. College of Europe, 2006; Ph.D. candidate at the University of Edinburgh. This paper was first presented at the international conference “The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications” organized by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations and the Israeli Association for the Study of European Integration in Jerusalem on 13 and 14 July 2008. The author thanks Prof. Charlie Jeffery for his encouragement.

Eve Chava Landau
Professor of Law at Webster University Geneva, LL.B. (London) Docteur en droit (Paris), Diploma of the Hague Academy of International Law, Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (Frankfurt/Main). Senior Research Fellow of the L. Davis Institute (Jerusalem). Taught at the Universities of Luxembourg, Geneva, Tel-Aviv and the Hebrew University Jerusalem, published numerous legal books and articles on International and European legal topics.

Edith Drieskens
Edith Drieskens works at the Institute for International and European Policy at Leuven University, Belgium. A central question in her research is to what degree PA theory can explain the representation and coordination behavior of the EUMS in the UNSC, especially for sanctions decisions. From September through December 2007, she assisted the Belgian UNSC Team, interning at the Permanent Representation of Belgium to the UN. From September 2007 through February 2008, she was also in residence at the Center on International Organization at Columbia University. This article is a revised version of a paper which was presented at the Hebrew University (Jerusalem) on 14 July 2008 at the conference on ‘The Lisbon Reform Treaty: Internal and External Implications’, organized by the Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Israeli Association for the Study of European Integration and the Czech Association of European Studies. The author would like to thank the participants as well as Tom Delreux, Bart Kerremans and Stephan Keukeleire for their comments on the original text.
Showing 981 - 1000 of 1472 results
1 2 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 »
You can search full text for articles by entering your search term in the search field. If you click the search button the search results will be shown on a fresh page where the search results can be narrowed down by category or year.