Search result: 16 articles

x
Editorial

From the Editor

Journal Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 2 2018
Authors Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink
Martin Brink, PhD, is attorney at law, arbitrator and deputy judge at the The Hague Court of Appeals and an internationally certified mediator (MfN, IMI, CEDR Global Panel).
Editorial

From the Editor

Journal Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 1 2018
Authors Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink
Martin Brink, PhD, is attorney at law, arbitrator and deputy judge at the The Hague Court of Appeals and an internationally certified mediator (MfN, IMI, CEDR Global Panel).
Article

The Negotiation Element in Mediation

The Impact of Anchoring

Journal Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 2 2017
Authors Martin Brink
Author's information

Martin Brink
Martin Brink, PhD, is attorney at law, arbitrator and deputy judge at the The Hague Court of Appeals and an internationally certified mediator (MfN, IMI, CEDR Global Panel).
Editorial

From the Editor

Journal Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 2 2017
Authors Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink

Martin Brink

    What is there to learn about managing conflict or negotiation that you do not already know? How can mediation techniques make a difference in achieving your personal goals and advance the objectives of your organisation even when there is no conflict? How can new skills benefit all management levels and change the role of the legal department?
    This issue of the Corporate Mediation Journal will address these and other questions. Is corporate mediation a prospect for the legal department and organisations as a whole?


Martin Brink
Martin Brink, PhD, is attorney at law, arbitrator and deputy judge at the The Hague Court of Appeals and an internationally certified mediator (MfN, IMI, CEDR Global Panel).
Editorial

Access_open Editorial

Journal Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 1 2016
Authors Martin Brink

Martin Brink
Article

Out of the Box? Domestic and Private International Law Aspects of Gender Registration

A Comparative Analysis of Germany and the Netherlands

Journal European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 2 2015
Keywords gender identity, sex registration, intersex, transgender, private international law
Authors Dr. Marjolein van den Brink, Dr. iur. Philipp Reuß and Dr. Jet Tigchelaar
AbstractAuthor's information

    The legal regulation of gender identity seems to be in a state of flux. This paper compares the German and Dutch legal systems with regard to the registration of a person’s sex, focusing on the possibility in both countries not to register a baby’s sex until it can be clearly determined. In both systems, it has thus become possible that a person has no specified gender for a considerable period of time. These persons may encounter various kinds of legal problems, since the two jurisdictions have not been adapted to accommodate them. In addition, two potential problems regarding private international law issues are discussed.


Dr. Marjolein van den Brink
Dr. Marjolein van den Brink is assistant professor at the Netherlands institute for human rights (SIM), Utrecht University. She participates in the research programme of the Utrecht centre for European research into family law.

Dr. iur. Philipp Reuß
Philipp Reuß, Dr. iur., MJur (Oxford) is research assistant at LMU Munich’s Institute of international law –comparative law.

Dr. Jet Tigchelaar
Dr. Jet Tigchelaar is assistant professor at the Institute of jurisprudence, constitutional and administrative law, Utrecht University. She participates as researcher at the Utrecht centre for European research into family law.
Article

Access_open Juveniles’ Right to Counsel during Police Interrogations: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of a Youth-Specific Approach, with a Particular Focus on the Netherlands

Journal Erasmus Law Review, Issue 4 2014
Keywords legal representation, counsel, juvenile justice, police interrogations, children’s rights
Authors Prof. Dr. Ton Liefaard Ph.D. LL.M and Yannick van den Brink
AbstractAuthor's information

    The right to counsel of juveniles at the stage of police interrogations has gained significant attention since the Salduz ruling of the European Court on Human Rights in 2008. The legislative and policy developments that have taken place since then and that are still ongoing – both on a regional (European) and domestic (Dutch) level – reveal a shared belief that juvenile suspects must be awarded special protection in this phase of the criminal justice proceedings. This calls for a youth-specific approach as fundamentally different from the common approach for adults. At the same time, there seems to be ambivalence concerning the justification and concrete implications of such a youth-specific approach. This article aims to clarify the underlying rationale and significance of a youth specific approach to the right to counsel at the stage of police interrogations on the basis of an interdisciplinary analysis of European Court on Human Rights case law, international children’s rights standards and relevant developmental psychological insights. In addition, this article aims to position this right of juveniles in conflict with the law in the particular context of the Dutch juvenile justice system and provide concrete recommendations to the Dutch legislator.


Prof. Dr. Ton Liefaard Ph.D. LL.M
Prof. Dr. T. Liefaard is Professor of Children’s Rights (UNICEF Chair) at Leiden Law School, Department of Child Law; t.liefaard@law.leidenuniv.nl.

Yannick van den Brink
Y.N. van den Brink, LL.M, MA, is PhD researcher at Leiden Law School, Department of Child Law; y.n.van.den.brink@law.leidenuniv.nl.
Symposium

Vrouwen in de Wetenschap

Journal Res Publica, Issue 4 2009
Authors Catherine de Vries, Barbara Vis, Jan Beyers e.a.
Author's information

Catherine de Vries
Catherine de Vries (1978) is universitair docent Politicologie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Haar onderzoek naar stemgedrag, publieke opinie, politieke partijen en Europese politiek is verschenen in gerenommeerde politicologische tijdschriften als Electoral Studies, European Journal of Political Research, European Union Politics en Party Politics. Momenteel onderzoekt Catherine met behulp van een Veni beurs van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek de invloed van mediaberichtgeving en partijstandpunten over Europese integratie op de keuzes van kiezers in nationale verkiezingen in vijf West-Europese landen.

Barbara Vis
Barbara Vis (1979) is universitair docent Vergelijkende Politicologie aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Zij heeft gepubliceerd in gerenommeerde tijdschriften als European Journal of Political Research, Journal of Theoretical Politics, Journal of European Social Policy en Policy & Politics. In 2010 verschijnt haar boek Politics of Risk-Taking bij Amsterdam University Press. Een Veni beurs van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (beurs no. 451-08-012) financiert Barbara’s onderzoek.

Jan Beyers
Jan Beyers (1968) is Hoogleraar Politieke Wetenschappen en Directeur Onderzoeksgroep Internationale en Europese Politiek, Universiteit Antwerpen. Zijn onderzoek situeert zich op het brede terrein van politieke instituties, meer bepaald Europese instituties en multilevel governance. Momenteel begeleidt Jan een onderzoek over hoe functionele en territoriale belangen zich aanpassen aan meerlagige politieke opportuniteitsstructuren. Dit project wordt gefinancierd door het Odysseus-programma van het Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen.

Marieke van den Brink
Marieke van den Brink (1978) is postdoc researcher 'Gender in Organisaties' aan de Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Haar onderzoeksgebied is de werking van gender en diversiteit in organisaties, in het bijzonder werving en selectiepraktijken, weerstanden tegen diversiteitsbeleid en de werking van netwerken.

Joyce Outshoorn
Joyce Outshoorn (1944) is politicologe en hoogleraar vrouwenstudies aan de Universiteit en verbonden aan Instituut Politieke Wetenschap. Haar onderzoek richt zich op vrouwenbewegingen, emancipatiebeleid, abortus en prostitutie.

Sandra van Thiel
Sandra van Thiel (1968) is universitair hoofddocent bestuurskunde aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR) en van 2004-2008 zakelijk directeur van de Nederlandse Onderzoeksschool voor Bestuurskunde en Politicologie (NIG). Haar onderzoek betreft de verzelfstandiging van overheidsorganisaties, in Nederland en andere landen.

Sandra Groeneveld
Sandra Groeneveld (1972) is universitair docent bestuurskunde aan de EUR en per 2009 zakelijk directeur van NIG. Sandra geeft onderwijs in kwantitatieve methoden en technieken van onderzoek en HRM. Haar onderzoek is gericht op vraagstukken rond arbeid, organisatie en management in de publieke sector, in het bijzonder diversiteit.
Article

Access_open On the Enactment of Corporate Arrangements

Journal Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2009
Keywords collective responsibility, individual responsibility
Authors prof. Bert van den Brink
AbstractAuthor's information

    Whereas Pettit distinguishes between responsibility for the enactment of a directly harmful act and responsibility for the arrangement or constitution that channels the formation of a corporate agent’s beliefs, desires, and intentions, we should acknowledge the existence of yet a third level of responsibility: the enactment of corporate arrangements that makes the enactment of harmful corporate actions likely or unavoidable.


prof. Bert van den Brink
Bert van den Brink is Associate Professor of Political and Social Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy of Utrecht University.
Showing all 16 results
You can search full text for articles by entering your search term in the search field. If you click the search button the search results will be shown on a fresh page where the search results can be narrowed down by category or year.