The Inícia case concluded at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) on 13 November 2019 shows that international arbitration institutions may have a significant role even in the EU Member States’ disputes concerning the cross-border acquisition of agricultural lands. Taking the regulation concerning cross-border acquisition into consideration, the last decade was extremely eventful: (i) Following the expiration of transitional periods, the new Member States were obliged to adopt new, EU law-conform national rules concerning the cross-border acquisition of agricultural lands. (ii) The European Commission began to generally and comprehensively assess the national land law of the new Member States. (iii) The FAO issued the Voluntary Guidelines on the ‘Responsible Governance of Tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security’ (VGGT), which is the first comprehensive, global instrument on this topic elaborated in the framework of intergovernmental negotiations. (iv) Several legal documents, which can be regarded as soft law, concerning the acquisition of agricultural lands have been issued by certain institutions of the EU; these soft law documents at EU level are as rare as the VGGT at international level. (v) The EU initiated numerous international investment treaties, regulations of which also affect numerous aspects of the cross-border acquisition of agricultural lands. (vi) The Brexit and its effect on the cross-border acquisition of agricultural lands is also an open issue. Taking the above-mentioned development into consideration, the Inícia case may have a significant role in the future of the cross-border transaction among EU Member States and beyond. |
Search result: 48 articles
Article |
A New Aspect of the Cross-Border Acquisition of Agricultural LandsThe Inícia Case Before the ICSID |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | ICSID, investment law, free movement of capital, land tenure, land law |
Authors | János Ede Szilágyi and Tamás Andréka |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Literature Review |
The 2019 Henry Wheaton PrizeAn Introduction to Katalin Sulyok’s Award-Winning PhD Dissertation |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | Henry Wheaton prize, environmental disputes, scientific argument, judicial interaction, burden of proof |
Authors | Gabriella Szamek |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Katalin Sulyok, senior lecturer at ELTE Law School, Department of International Law was awarded the Henry Wheaton Prize by the Institut de Droit International in 2019; this prize is awarded by an international jury to the best English, German, French, Italian or Spanish language PhD dissertation in the field of international environmental law. This article presents and evaluates the major findings of the award-winning dissertation entitled ‘Scientific Engagement of International Courts and Tribunals in Environmental Disputes – Science and the Legitimacy of Adjudicatory Reasoning’. |
Article |
The Temporal Effect and the Continuance in Force of the Treaty of TrianonA Hundred Years Later |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | peace treaties, Trianon Peace Treaty, termination of treaties, temporal effect of international treaties, law of international treaties |
Authors | Norbert Tóth |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The 1920 Trianon Peace Treaty ended World War I between Hungary and its belligerents. Nonetheless, one hundred years have passed since then, yet this peace treaty is still unsettling to many, causing misbelief, hatred, anger and misunderstanding both in Hungary and its neighboring countries. To unearth the temporal aspects of the Trianon Peace Treaty, more precisely, to identify exactly what obligations remain in force following this rather hectic century, it is indispensable to study the temporal effect of this agreement. The present article aims at arriving at a conclusion in relation to several misbeliefs held with respect to the Trianon Peace Treaty as well as the issue of its termination. |
Literature Review |
László Fodor, A falu füstje (Book Review)Gondolat, Budapest, 2019, 480 p, ISBN 978-963-693-364-7 |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | István Hoffman |
Author's information |
Article |
The Protection of the Right to Local Self-Government in the Practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | right to local self-government, protected powers, European Charter of Local Self-Government, Hungary, Constitutional Court of Hungary |
Authors | Ádám Varga |
AbstractAuthor's information |
A specific trait of local self-governments is that they exercise public power, while public power is also exercised against them. This means that those functions and powers that are obligations on the side of local self-governments, can be construed as rights against central public bodies. For this reason, the protection of the right to local self-government is a priority. The Charter of Local Self-Government takes the view that the autonomy of local self-governments shall be guaranteed against central public bodies. It is necessary to establish a legal framework which ensures that strong central public bodies cannot enforce their own political or professional preferences against the will of local communities with different political or professional beliefs. In my opinion, the central issue, also in Hungary, is that local self-governments are entitled to the protection of the Constitutional Court. Decision No. 3311/2019. (XI. 21.) AB sets out that local self-governments are entitled to turn to the Constitutional Court in their own right by submitting a constitutional complaint if the law violates their rights guaranteed in the Fundamental Law (including powers enshrined in the Fundamental Law). While the decision is still very recent, nevertheless, thanks to its local self-governments may expect the substantive review of their petitions by the Constitutional Court in the future. |
Case Notes |
The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Protection of GroundwaterDecision No. 13/2018. (IX. 4.) AB of the Constitutional Court of Hungary |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | environmental impact assessment, precautionary principle, non-derogation principle, Constitutional Court of Hungary, groundwater |
Authors | Gábor Kecskés |
AbstractAuthor's information |
On 28 August 2018, the Constitutional Court of Hungary delivered a milestone decision [Decision No. 13/2018. (IX. 4.) AB] in relation to the protection of groundwater with reference to the general protection of the environment as a constitutionally protected value. The President of the Republic pointed out in his petition to the Constitutional Court that two sections of the draft legislation are contrary to the Fundamental Law by violating Articles B(1), P(1) and XXI(1) of the Fundamental Law by permitting water abstraction with much lower standards. Adopted by the majority along with concurring and dissenting opinions, the decision is an important judicial achievement in the general framework of constitutional water and environmental protection. It also confirms the non-derogation principle elaborated by the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court had the opportunity and an ‘open mind’ to take into consideration numerous sources of scientific professional evidence on the stock of water and groundwater abstraction. The decision was acclaimed for its environmental orientation, and even more, for developing the 25-year old standards of constitutional review in environmental matters by elaborating on the implicit substance of several articles enshrined in the new Fundamental Law (e.g. Articles P and XXI). |
Case Notes |
Practical Questions Concerning the Relationship Between a Member State’s Constitution, EU Law and the Case-Law of the CJEUDecision No. 2/2019. (III. 5.) AB of the Constitutional Court of Hungary |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | Constitutional Court of Hungary, constitutional dialogue, non-refoulement, right to asylum, EU law and national law |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In 2018, the Hungarian Parliament amended the Fundamental Law, which, among others, contains the principle of non-refoulement, and stipulated at constitutional level that “a non-Hungarian national shall not be entitled to asylum if he or she arrived in the territory of Hungary through any country where he or she was not persecuted or directly threatened with persecution.” Partly due to this new provision of the Fundamental Law and partly based on other Hungarian laws, the European Commission initiated an infringement procedure against Hungary. According to the Hungarian Government, in this procedure the Commission misinterprets the Fundamental Law, therefore (inter alia) the authentic interpretation of this provision was requested from the Constitutional Court. In its Decision No. 2/2019. (III. 5.) AB, the Constitutional Court did not only interpret the provision in question, but it also elaborated on certain matters regarding its own competence in relation to EU law, as well as making relevant findings also in relation to Hungary’s constitution and the interpretation thereof in accordance with the EU law, based on the doctrine of ‘constitutional dialogue’. In this paper, I analyze this decision of the Constitutional Court in detail. |
Editorial |
Editorial Comments: The Relevance of Foreign Investment Protection in International and EU LawForeword to Vol. 8 (2020) of the Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
Author's information |
Article |
The ECtHR’s Grand Chamber Judgment in Ilias and Ahmed Versus Hungary: A Practical and Realistic ApproachCan This Paradigm Shift Lead the Reform of the Common European Asylum System? |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | ECHR, Hungarian transit zone, deprivation of liberty, concept of safe third country, Common European Asylum System |
Authors | Ágnes Töttős |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary reflected a big turn of the ECtHR towards a practical and realistic approach. Although the Grand Chamber found that Hungary by choosing to use inadmissibility grounds and expel the applicants to Serbia failed to carry out a thorough assessment of the Serbian asylum system, including the risk of summary removal, contrary to the Chamber it found that a confinement of 23 days in 2015 did not constitute a de facto deprivation of liberty. This paradigm shift is already visible in further decisions of the Court, and it could even serve as a basis for a new direction when reforming the Common European Asylum System. |
Article |
The Role of the Seat in Smart Contract Disputes |
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | smart contracts, international commercial arbitration, blockchain technology, online arbitration |
Authors | Diana Itzel Santana Galindo |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Over the past few decades, international commercial arbitration has experienced major developments in various fields. A major recent development that will spread widely in the years to come relates to technology and the necessity of international commercial arbitration to adapt to the new needs of the market. The path of technological development in commerce is determined by forces other than the needs of legal practitioners. Moreover, the lack of real connection to a sole place, in disputes where the multi-parties have not selected the seat, can create serious obstacles for the arbitral proceedings in blockchain technology disputes. In this regard, smart contracts, however, appear to have identifiable parties with an identified physical point of connection that ultimately can be adapted to the existing place of the arbitration theory within the international arbitration legal framework. |
Article |
The New Hungarian Private International Law CodeSomething Old and Something New |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | private international law, codification, general part of the New Hungarian Private International Law Code, legal institutions in the New Hungarian Private International Law Code, EU private international law regulations |
Authors | Katalin Raffai |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Since the adoption of Law Decree No. 13 of 1979 on Private International Law (Old Code) both the legal environment of the EU and the Hungarian legal and social background have undergone substantial changes. Without questioning its progressive character, it must be stated that the Old Code wore the imprints of the era in which it was drafted. With the fall of the socialist system, the necessary amendments were made to the system of the Old Code, accelerated by Hungary’s accession to the EU. All the above played an important role in the Government’s order to begin work on the comprehensive modernization of the Old Code. The Act XXVIII of 2017 on Private International Law (New Code) entered into force on 1 January 2018. The present study focuses on the following topics: the reasons for the revision of the Old Code, the presentation of the relationship between the New Code and EU regulations in the system of legal instruments, and the review of legal institutions in the general part, with special attention to the major changes undertaken compared to the Old Code. |
Article |
The Precautionary Principle in the Fundamental Law of HungaryJudicial Activism or an Inherent Fundamental Principle? An Evaluation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/2018. (IX. 4.) AB on the Protection of Groundwater |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | Constitutional Court of Hungary, precautionary principle, judicial activism, Article P of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, constitutional protection of the environment |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Acting upon the motion of the President of the Republic, the Constitutional Court of Hungary ruled in its Decision No. 13/2018. (IX. 4.) AB that the regulation which would have allowed establishing new wells up to the depth of 80m without a license or notification was contrary to the Fundamental Law. The Constitutional Court found in its decision that the regulation would endanger the volume and quality of underground water in a way that, considering the precautionary principle, was no longer compatible with the protection of natural resources and cultural artefacts forming the common heritage of the nation as laid down in Article P(1) of the Fundamental Law or Article XXI(1) of the same on the right to a healthy environment. It was in this decision that the Constitutional Court first outlined in detail the constitutional significance of the precautionary principle, with this principle forming the central part of the decision’s reasoning. Within the framework of this study I examine whether this decision based on the precautionary principle can be considered the ‘extraction’ of what is inherently present in the Fundamental Law or on the contrary, whether it was an activist approach imposing the principle on the Fundamental Law. |
Editorial |
Legal, Ethical and Economical Impacts of Intergenerational Equity (Editorial Comments)Foreword to Vol. 7 (2019) of the Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
Author's information |
Article |
A Multipolar System for the Protection of Fundamental Rights in PracticeUnjustified Dismissals of Government Officials in Hungary |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | Constitutional Court of Hungary, Multilevel constitutionalism, right to an effective remedy, unjustified dismissal of government officials, European protection of fundamental rights |
Authors | Zsuzsanna Szabó |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Today, within the European multi-level and cooperative constitutional area the ECHR, the constitutional values enshrined in the EU Treaties together with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as the constitutions of the EU Member States function as parallel constitutions. The legal remedies offered by international forums are subsidiary by nature, since it is desirable that legal issues of human rights be solved by the states at national level. The obligation to exhaust domestic legal remedies as a procedural precondition is necessary to afford the national level the opportunity to remedy the violation of human rights within its own legal system. This paper focuses on Section 8(1) of Act LVIII of 2010 on the legal status of government officials, which states that the employer has the right to terminate the contract of government officials with a two months’ notice period without justification. This research is of considerable interest because the dismissed officials – who, in my opinion, de facto suffered injury for the violation of their human rights – were forced to turn to international fora due to the fact that the Hungarian legal system was unable to grant them proper relief. Therefore, the analysis also evaluates the current level of fundamental rights adjudication and jurisprudence related to fundamental principles in Hungary. |
Article |
EUdentity – European Conference on Constitutional IdentityReport on the ‘Constitutional EUdentity 2019’ Conference Organized by the Constitutional Court of Hungary, 8 March 2019, Budapest |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Attila Szabó |
Author's information |
Article |
Key Factors of the Development and Renewal of the Social Market Economy in the EU |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | Europe 2020 strategy, social market economy, eco-social market economy, social welfare systems, EU structural funds |
Authors | István Kőrösi |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The purpose of this study is to present the principles, strategy and operation of the social market economy, based on legal, political and economic considerations. The first social market economy, West Germany – followed by Austria, the Netherlands, as well as other countries in Northern and Western Europe –, mustered a positive overall performance from the post-World War II years to the early 1970s. Since then, however, we have been witnessing the erosion, distortion and decline of efficiency of the social market economy. There are four main issues to be addressed: (i) What are the main theoretical and conceptual, ‘eternal’ elements of the social market economy? (ii) What economic policy was built on this theoretical foundation and why did the system work well in Western Europe after World War II? (iii) What factors eroded this system? (iv) Can social market economy be renewed in the second decade of the 21st century and, if it can, what are the preconditions of it? In my analysis, I highlight some key areas: EU policies, Lisbon Agenda and Europe 2020 strategy, growth, financial disequilibria and competitiveness, innovation and employment, the relation of state and market. |
Article |
To the Margin of the Theory of a New Type of WarfareExamining Certain Aspects of Cyber Warfare |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | new types of security challenges, cyberspace, cyber warfare, cyber attack, cyber defense |
Authors | Ádám Farkas and Roland Kelemen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In the second half of the 20th century, humanity went through an unprecedented technical and technological development. As a result, technological innovations emerged in the course of the last third of the century which have now become indispensable parts of everyday life, the whole society and even the state. Among them, we must mention the IT sector, which has effectively enabled global contacts and communication between people and organizations across different parts of the world through various tools, programs and networks. Moreover, it also facilitates and simplifies everyday tasks both in the private and the public sector. Cyberspace is a unique and complex phenomenon, since it can be described with physical and geographical concepts, but in addition, its virtual features also have extraordinary relevance. As a result of its remarkable expansion, fundamental areas such as sociology, geopolitics, security policy or warfare must also be reconsidered. This paper provides an overview of the new types of security challenges for the 21st century, most notably security risks related to the cyberspace. In addition, some aspects of cyber warfare, such as cyber intelligence, cyber attack and cyber defense are examined. Particular attention is given to the question whether a cyber attack in itself can reach the level of an armed attack, and if so, what means can be used by the State under attack in defense. |
Article |
Importance of the Legal Protection of Biological DiversityThoughts on the Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 28/2017 (X. 25.) AB |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2018 |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
Author's information |
Editorial |
Editor's Note |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2018 |
Authors | Petra Lea Láncos and Réka Varga |