|
Search result: 453 articles
Rulings |
ECJ 13 November 2018, case C-432/17 (Cepelnik), Other forms of free movementCepelnik d.o.o. – v – Michael Vavti, Austrian case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 4 2018 |
Keywords | Other forms of free movement |
Abstract |
Pending cases |
Case C-134/18, Social insuranceMaria Vester – v – Rijksdienst voor Ziekte- en Invaliditeitsverzekering (Riziv), reference lodged by the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) on 19 February 2018 |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 4 2018 |
Rulings |
ECJ 6 September 2018, case C-527/16 (Alpenrind), Free movement, Social InsuranceSalzburger Gebietskrankenkasse, Bundesminister für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz (interested parties: Alpenrind GmbH and others), Austrian case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 4 2018 |
Keywords | Free movement, Social insurance |
Abstract |
|
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2018 |
Keywords | Cicero, Augustine, Bartolus, piracy, universal jurisdiction |
Authors | Louis Sicking |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Piracy holds a special place within the field of international law because of the universal jurisdiction that applies. This article reconsiders the role of piracy in the development of universal jurisdiction. While usually a connection is established between Cicero’s ‘enemy of all’ and modern conceptions of pirates, it is argued that ‘enemy of the human species’ or ‘enemy of humanity’ is a medieval creation, used by Bartolus, which must be understood in the wake of the Renaissance of the twelfth century and the increased interest for the study of Roman Law. The criminalization of the pirate in the late Middle Ages must be understood not only as a consequence of royal power claiming a monopoly of violence at sea. Both the Italian city-states and the Hanse may have preceded royal power in criminalizing pirates. All the while, political motives in doing so were never absent. |
Rulings |
ECJ 7 August 2018, case C-123/17 (Yön), Free movementNefiye Yön – v – Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, German case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2018 |
Keywords | Free movement |
Abstract |
|
Case Reports |
2018/27 Citizen’s rights after Brexit: no preliminary questions to the ECJ (NL) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2018 |
Keywords | Free movement, Work and residence permit, Other forms of free movement |
Authors | Jan-Pieter Vos |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Amsterdam Court of First Instance had contemplated asking certain preliminary questions to the ECJ about the EU rights of UK citizens residing outside the UK (see EELC 2018/18), but the Court of Appeal has now refused this, considering the underlying claims to be too vague. |
Rulings |
ECJ 28 June 2018, case C-2/17 (Crespo Rey), Social InsuranceInstituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) – v – Jesús Crespo Rey, Spanish Case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2018 |
Keywords | Social insurance |
Abstract |
|
Conversations on restorative justice |
A talk with Daniel Van Ness |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 3 2018 |
Authors | Albert Dzur |
Author's information |
Article |
Restorative justice as feminist practice |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 3 2018 |
Keywords | Restorative justice, gender-based violence, feminism |
Authors | Leigh Goodmark |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Feminists have viewed the implementation of restorative practices warily, particularly in the context of gender-based harms. Concerns include the devaluing of gender-based harms, the reprivatisation of violence against women and the inability of restorative practitioners to guarantee safety for people subjected to abuse. But this article will argue that restorative justice can be a uniquely feminist practice, growing out of the same mistrust of state-based systems and engagement of the community that animated the early feminist movement. Although some caution is warranted, restorative justice serves the feminist goals of amplifying women’s voices, fostering women’s autonomy and empowerment, engaging community, avoiding gender essentialism and employing an intersectional analysis, transforming patriarchal structures and ending violence against women. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2018 |
Authors | Peter Mascini and Wibo van Rossum |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2018 |
Keywords | law and society, sociology of law, sociolegal, empirical legal studies |
Authors | Daniel Blocq and Maartje van der Woude |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article aims to deepen scholarly understanding of the Law and Society Movement (L&S) and thereby strengthen debates about the relation between Empirical Legal Studies (ELS) and L&S. The article departs from the observation that ELS, understood as an initiative that emerged in American law schools in the early 2000s, has been quite successful in generating more attention to the empirical study of law and legal institutions in law schools, both in- and outside the US. In the early years of its existence, L&S – another important site for the empirical study of law and legal institutions – also had its center of gravity inside the law schools. But over time, it shifted towards the social sciences. This article discusses how that happened, and more in general explains how L&S became ever more diverse in terms of substance, theory and methods. |
Article |
|
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2018 |
Keywords | social and economic rights, austerity measures, Euro crisis, defaulting countries |
Authors | Dr. Natalie Alkiviadou |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In 2008, the European Union was hit by the most severe financial downturn since the Great Recession of the 1930s. One of the major consequences of this phenomenon was the deterioration in the enjoyment of human rights, in particular economic and social rights. While it is indisputable that the crisis itself was directly correlated to the erosion of such rights, the conditions attached to the loan agreements between defaulting countries and the three lending institutions, namely the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Central Bank and the European Commission, have negatively affected the rights under consideration. Loans came with strict austerity measures, such as public expenditure cuts in the realm of, inter alia, public services, benefits and social security. This article considers the deterioration in the enjoyment of economic and social rights by Union inhabitants and particularly the anti-crisis strategy adopted by the European Union, which, as will be demonstrated, directly contributed to this deterioration. The stance of the three institutions was facilitated by the less than proactive, but improving, positioning of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case law, which will be assessed. It must be noted that it is not the three institutions acting alone in this process; the Member States are the ones who agree to the loans and their conditions and implement austerity measures on the ground. However, as will be reflected, the practical role and actual input of the countries themselves in this procedure is limited. The central theoretical tenet of the article is that the European Union is re-shifting its direction to the almost absolute adoption of an economic constitution, with little regard to its social counterpart. Within the aforementioned framework, this article seeks to assess the status of economic and social rights in a crisis-hit Union, provide a theoretical explanation for this occurrence and put forth possibilities for positive change, placing the protection and promotion of economic and social rights at the heart of any responses to crisis as a method to ensure their sustainable protection effectively. |
Article |
Plain LanguageA Promising Tool for Quality Legislation |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2018 |
Keywords | plain language, clarity, precision, accessibility, interpretation |
Authors | Kally K.L. Lam LLB |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The hypothesis of this article is that plain language drafting with innovative drafting techniques can improve the quality of legislation. Further to this, the article tries to prove that quality legislation can also make the law more accessible to its general audience. With regard to quality, the article assesses plain language drafting with innovative drafting techniques using Helen Xanthaki’s criteria of quality in legislation, i.e. that it should be clear, precise and unambiguous. With regard to accessibility, it is defined broadly as to include readability. I will first assess whether plain language drafting with innovative drafting techniques can meet the expectations of its general audience and second discuss whether legislation drafted in plain language with innovative techniques passes the usability tests. |
Conversations on restorative justice |
A talk with Albie Sachs |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 2 2018 |
Authors | Albert Dzur |
Author's information |
Article |
Introducing and theorising an in-prison restorative justice programme: the second-generation Sycamore Tree Project |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 2 2018 |
Keywords | Sycamore Tree Project, in-prison restorative justice programming, human condition, liminality, narrative |
Authors | Jane Anderson |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article introduces an in-prison restorative justice programme: the second-generation Sycamore Tree Project (STP-2). The programme brings together crime victims and unrelated offenders in a prison setting to discuss and address the harm of crime to their lives. In the first part of the article, description is given to how STP-2 has evolved in Australia from a ‘faith-based’ programme to one that is restorative. In the second part, three anthropological theories are used to provide explanation and prediction of the transformative effects of in-prison restorative justice programming on prisoners as informed by STP-2. The prisoner-participant is viewed as a ‘person’ who, in liminal conditions, is afforded agency to create a meaningful narrative that is directed to revising how one is to associate with others in morally acceptable ways. The article concludes with a comparison between STP-1 and STP-2, and some proposals for research beyond this theoretical excursion. |
Article |
Restorative justice as empowerment: how to better serve the goals of punitive retribution |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 2 2018 |
Keywords | Restorative justice, retributive punishment, empowerment of victims, restoring dignity and autonomy in survivors of crime |
Authors | Theo van Willigenburg |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Restorative justice practices are applied only to the margins of criminal justice systems. These systems generally punish the wrongdoer in order to give him his ‘just desert’. For restorative justice to be more attractive, we need to understand why punitive retribution is such a powerful motive. If the scales of justice are out of balance because of suffering inflicted (to the offended), why would the infliction of more suffering (to the offender) bring redemption? It is argued that much of the sting of being harmed by an offender derives from the identity implications of the act. Punitive retribution may satisfy short-lasting vindictive desires, but its main symbolic function is to restore the victim’s self-image and dignity by humiliating the perpetrator. This is done in a notoriously indirect and ineffective way, though. It is argued that restorative justice can do much better, if it is understood in terms of empowering the offended. This involves procedures that restore the victim’s autonomy, prestige and self-confidence. Apart from bringing the offended back into the driver’s seat of the process, restorative justice empowers the survivors of crime by helping them face offenders, face themselves and face their community. Restorative justice is not only much more rewarding than punitive retribution, it also provides better ways of communicating personal and public disapproval of crime. |
Article |
|
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 2 2018 |
Keywords | Peer mentoring, justice-involved youth, formerly incarcerated, secondary desistance, training programmes |
Authors | Mayra Lopez-Humphreys and Barbra Teater |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article introduces a mentoring programme for justice-involved youth that utilises the unique and often overlooked resources offered by adults with a history of incarceration, and the innovative training model that aims to promote secondary desistance and restorative justice among the mentors. An examination of the generative role of peer mentoring and its overlap with restorative justice as a healing process that provides opportunities for offenders to make indirect amends that contribute to the social rehabilitation of their communities is presented. An overview of the history and anticipated aims of mentoring programmes for justice-involved youth is provided, followed by a discussion of the importance of secondary desistance in peer mentoring programmes and a review of the elements, conceptual underpinnings and anticipated benefits of the training programme for the mentors. The training programme is argued to offer approaches that support the primary and secondary desistance-orientated changes and the reparative work needed within the mentor. |
Human Rights Practice Review |
Latvia |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2018 |
Authors | Lolita Bērziņa, Artūrs Kučs and Eva Vīksna |
Author's information |
Human Rights Practice Review |
Croatia |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2018 |
Authors | Maša Marochini Zrinski PhD |
Author's information |
Article |
Regional Judicial and Non-judicial BodiesAn Effective Means for Protecting Human Rights? |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2018 |
Keywords | Direct access, human rights protection, judicial bodies, non-judicial bodies, direct access of individuals |
Authors | Ján Klučka |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Regional human rights systems consisting of regional bodies, instruments and mechanisms play an important role in the promotion and protection of human rights. If one’s rights are not protected on the domestic level, the international system comes into play and protection can be provided either by the regional or global (UN) system. Regional mechanisms of human rights today cover five parts of the world, namely: Africa, the Americas, Europe, Arab countries and the Asia-Pacific. They differ in their origin, resulting from different concepts of human rights and the need of interested states to establish a regional framework for human rights protection. The level and scope of their human rights protection is obviously uneven, although this protection is generally higher in regions with democratic states that have constitutional and rule of law regimes in which human rights are considered an integral part of their constitutional architecture. However, current practice confirms that the creation of judicial systems for the protection of human rights within the context of concrete regions does not automatically guarantee the right of direct access of individuals to them. The regional particularities of locus standi result from a set of factors having historic, religious, ethnic and other nature. In the institutional system of protection of human rights, these particularities manifest also through the optional (non-compulsory) jurisdiction of regional judicial bodies, the preventive ‘filtering’ systems before non-judicial bodies (commissions) combined with the right to bring the case before a judicial body, the systems where different entities are entitled to bring the case before a judicial body but the individual has no such right etc. Nevertheless, the existing practice generally confirms the increasing role of the judicial segment of the regional human rights systems as well as the strengthening of position of individuals within the proceedings before regional human rights judicial and non-judicial bodies. A specific factor in the developing world represents the concept of a ‘strict’ interpretation of sovereignty preventing external control of the respect for human rights before a regional judicial body on the basis of an individual complaint by a concerned person. The specificities of regional systems are without detriment to their widely accepted advantages and benefits. Regional systems allow for the possibility of regional values to be taken into account when human rights norms are defined (e.g. so-called collective rights and duties within the African system), provided that the idea of the universality of human rights is not compromised. The regional systems are located closer to the individual human rights subjects and offer a more accessible forum in which individuals can pursue their cases, and states tend to show stronger political will to conform to decisions of regional human rights bodies. The existence of the regional human rights systems finally allows for the existence of proper enforcement mechanisms, which can better reflect local conditions than a global (universal) system of enforcement. |