Restorative justice has been criticised for not adequately giving serious consideration to the ‘public’ character of crimes. By bringing the ownership of the conflict involved in crime back to the victim and thus ‘privatising’ the conflict, restorative justice would overlook the need for crimes to be treated as public matters that concern all citizens, because crimes violate public values, i.e., values that are the foundation of a political community. Against this I argue that serious wrongs, like murder or rape, are violations of agent-neutral values that are fundamental to our humanity. By criminalising such serious wrongs we show that we take such violations seriously and that we stand in solidarity with victims, not in their capacity as compatriots but as fellow human beings. Such solidarity is better expressed by organising restorative procedures that serve the victim’s interest than by insisting on the kind of public condemnation and penal hardship that retributivists deem necessary ‘because the public has been wronged’. The public nature of crimes depends not on the alleged public character of the violated values but on the fact that crimes are serious wrongs that provoke a (necessarily reticent) response from government officials such as police, judges and official mediators. |
Search result: 731 articles
Article |
|
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 1 2022 |
Keywords | public wrongs, R.A. Duff, agent-relative values, criminalisation, punishment |
Authors | Theo van Willigenburg |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Notes from the field |
Reflections on the stories of Layla Alsheikh and Robi Damelin |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 1 2022 |
Authors | Tim Chapman |
Author's information |
Notes from the field |
Every enemy is someone whose story we do not know |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 1 2022 |
Authors | Robi Damelin |
Author's information |
Book Review |
Lindsey Pointer, The restorative justice ritual |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 1 2022 |
Authors | Gerry Johnstone |
Author's information |
Editorial |
|
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue Online First 2022 |
Authors | John Braithwaite |
Author's information |
Article |
The case for using culturally relevant values in restorative justice programming for Australian Aboriginal prisoners |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue Online First 2022 |
Keywords | Australia, Aboriginal, prison, values, restorative justice |
Authors | Jane Anderson |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Western Australia is experiencing high rates of recidivism among Aboriginal offenders. This challenge can be partly addressed by delivering culturally relevant programming. Its dearth, however, suggests two questions: what is culturally fit in the context of the prison, and how might such programming be constructed? This article responds to these questions by focusing on one element of culture, ‘values’, that is influential ideas that determine desirable courses of action in a culture. Firstly, a review of the literature and comparative analysis is given to the respective key values of Aboriginal culture and European and Anglo-Australian cultures. It also highlights the importance of repairing Aboriginal values with implications for providing culturally relevant prison programming. Secondly, a report is given on how an in-prison Aboriginal restorative justice programme (AIPRJP) was co-designed by Noongar Elders and prisoners and me, an Anglo-Australian restorativist. Using an ethnographic approach, the project identified a set of Aboriginal values for addressing the harms resulting from historical manifestations of wrongdoing by settler colonialism and contemporary crimes of Aboriginal offenders. Brief commentary is then given to the delivery of the AIPRJP, followed by a summary of findings and recommendations for using culturally relevant programming. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Global solidarity, Pandemics, Global Existential Threats, Collective Intelligence, CrowdLaw |
Authors | José Luis Martí |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Some of the existential threats we currently face are global in the sense that they affect us all, and thus matter of global concern and trigger duties of moral global solidarity. But some of these global threats, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, are global in a second, additional, sense: discharging them requires joint, coordinated global action. For that reason, these twofold global threats trigger political – not merely moral – duties of global solidarity. This article explores the contrast between these two types of global threats with the purpose of clarifying the distinction between moral and political duties of global solidarity. And, in the absence of a fully developed global democratic institutional system, the article also explores some promising ways to fulfill our global political duties, especially those based on mechanisms of collective intelligence such as CrowdLaw, which might provide effective solutions to these global threats while enhancing the democratic legitimacy of public decision-making. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Authors | Wouter Veraart, Lukas van den Berge and Antony Duff |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Discourse, Solidarity, Poststructuralism, Levinas, Derrida |
Authors | Thomas Jacobus de Jong and Carina van de Wetering |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This contribution explores the meaning and scope of solidarity with the emergence of the coronavirus discourse as formulated by politicians in order to make sense of the virus. It offers a poststructuralist account drawing on discourse theory together with insights from Levinas and Derrida. This leads to a critical reflection on the prevailing view of solidarity as secondary and derivative to corona policies, because solidarity is often subjugated to hegemonic meanings of efficiency. Instead, the argument is made that solidarity refers to the unique responsibility to which the other as wholly other commands me. This appeal for responsibility, that is presented in the face of the other, is to be assumed in the distance between the rules and the singularity of the situation. Accordingly, solidarity is described as a paradox of dependence (calculability) and independence (beyond calculation), that appears in a moment of undecidability, for it can never be overcome. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Social solidarity, COVID-19, Religious freedom, Cultural defence, Ultra-Orthodox sects in Israel |
Authors | Miriam Gur-Arye and Sharon Shakargy |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The article discusses the tension between social solidarity and religious freedom as demonstrated by the refusal of the ultra-Orthodox sects in Israel to comply with COVID-19 regulations. The article provides a detailed description of the refusal to comply with the regulations restricting mass prayer services in synagogues and studying Torah in the yeshivas, thus interfering with the ultra-Orthodox religious life. The article suggests possible explanations for that refusal, based on either religious beliefs or a socio-political claim to autonomy, and discusses whether the polity should be willing to tolerate such a refusal on the basis of the cultural defence. The article concludes that despite the drastic restrictions on religious life caused by the social distancing regulations, and the special importance of freedom of religion, reducing the pandemic’s spread called for awarding priority to solidarity over religious freedom, and the enforcement of social solidarity legal duties – the social distancing regulations – on all. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Solidarity, Community, COVID-19 pandemic, Humanity, Ethnocentrism |
Authors | Luigi Corrias |
AbstractAuthor's information |
What is at stake in invoking solidarity in legal-political contexts? The guiding hypothesis of this article is that solidarity is always and necessarily linked to the concept of community. A plea for solidarity will, in other words, directly lead one to the question: solidarity with whom? On the one hand, solidarity may be understood as extending only to those who belong to the same community as us. In this reading, solidarity builds upon an already existing community and applies to members only. On the other hand, invoked by those who aim to question the status quo, solidarity also plays a key role in practices of contestation. In these contexts, it focuses on collective action and the reimagination of political community. The article ends by articulating how this second interpretation of solidarity might prove helpful in making sense of our current predicament of a global pandemic. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Populism, Liberal democracy, Political representation, Société du spectacle, Theatrocracy |
Authors | Massimo La Torre |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Populism is a somehow intractable notion, since its reference is much too wide, comprising phenomena that are indeed in conflict between them, and moreover blurred, by being often used in an instrumental, polemical way. Such intractability is then radicalized through the two alternative approaches to populism, one that is more or less neutral, rooting in the political science tradition, and a second one, fully normative, though fed by political realism, founding as it does on a specific political theory and project. In the article an alternative view is proposed, that of populism as the politics that is congruent with the increasing role played by ‘screens’, icons, and images in social relationships and indeed in political representation. In this way populism is approached as the specific way politics is done within the context of a digitalized société du spectacle. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, The state’s duty to protect, Duty to rescue, Responsibility, Solidarity |
Authors | Konstantinos A Papageorgiou |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The article discusses a range of important normative questions raised by anti-COVID-19 measures and policies. Do governments have the right to impose such severe restrictions on individual freedom and furthermore do citizens have obligations vis-à-vis the state, others and themselves to accept such restrictions? I will argue that a democratic state may legitimately enforce publicly discussed, properly enacted and constitutionally tested laws and policies in order to protect its citizens from risks to life and limb. Even so, there is a natural limit, factual and normative, to what the state or a government can do in this respect. Citizens will also need to take it upon themselves not to harm and to protect others and in the context of a pandemic this means that endorsement of restrictions or other mandatory measures, notably vaccination, is not to be seen as a matter of personal preference concerning the supposedly inviolable sovereignty of one’s own body. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2021 |
Keywords | Solidarity, COVID-19 epidemic, Foucault, Social cohesion, Practicing |
Authors | Marli Huijer |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, most governments in Europe have imposed disciplinary and controlling mechanisms on their populations. In the name of solidarity, citizens are pressed to submit to lockdowns, social distancing or corona apps. Building on the historical-philosophical studies of Michel Foucault, this article shows that these mechanisms are spin-offs of health regimes that have evolved since the seventeenth century. In case of COVID-19, these regimes decreased the infection, morbidity and mortality rates. But, as a side-effect, they limited the opportunities to act together and practice solidarity. This negatively affected the social cohesion and public sphere in already highly individualistic societies. To prevent the further disappearing of solidarity – understood as something that is enacted rather than as a moral value or political principle – governments and citizens need to invest in the restoral of the social conditions that enable and facilitate the practicing of solidarity after the epidemic. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | Covid-19, vaccine passport |
Authors | Mart Susi and Tiina Pajuste |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This comparative study looks into the proposed “vaccine passport” initiative from various human rights aspects. It was undertaken by the Global Digital Human Rights Network, an action started under the EU’s Cooperation in Science and Technology programme. The network currently unites more than 80 scholars and practitioners from 40 countries. The findings are based on responses to questions put to the network members by the authors of this study in February 2021. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Authors | Martin Fertmann and Matthias C. Kettemann |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Terms-of-service based actions against political and state actors as both key subjects and objects of political opinion formation have become a focal point of the ongoing debates over who should set and enforce the rules for speech on online platforms. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | artificial intelligence, chatbots, CRM, data protection, privacy |
Authors | Konstantinos Kouroupis, Dimitrios Vagianos and Aikaterini Totka |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In the new digital era as it is formed by the European digital strategy, the explosion of e-commerce and related technologies has led to the formation of tremendous volumes of customer data that could be exploited in a variety of ways. Customer relationship management (CRM) systems can now exploit these data sets to map consumers’ behaviour more effectively. As social media and artificial intelligence widened their penetration, firms’ interest shifted to chatbots in order to serve their customers’ needs. Nowadays, CRM and bots are developed in a parallel way. With the help of these virtual personal assistants, CRM establishes a virtual relationship with consumers. However, the extended collection and use of personal data under this scope may give rise to ethical and legal issues. In this article, the term CRM is defined, followed by an analysis of the way chatbots support CRM systems. In the second part, the legal context of chatbot use will be highlighted in an attempt to investigate whether there are personal data protection issues and whether certain rights or ethical rules are somehow violated. The draft AI Regulation, in combination with the provisions of GDPR and e-Privacy Directive, offers a significant background for our study. The article concludes by demonstrating the use of chatbots as an inherent part of the new digital era and lays special emphasis on the term ‘transparency’, which seems to penetrate the lawfulness of their use and guarantee our privacy. |
Rulings |
ECJ 11 November 2021, case C-168/20 (MH and ILA (Droits à pension en cas de faillite)), Social Insurance, PensionBJ, OV – v – Mrs M, MH, ILA and Mr M, UK case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 4 2021 |
Keywords | Social Insurance, Pension |
Abstract |
A (host) Member State cannot make the exclusion of pension rights from bankruptcy estate dependent on obtaining prior tax approval in that country, if the scheme has already been tax approved in the home Member State, unless there is an overriding reason of public interest to do so. The ECJ’s summary of the case is available on: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-11/cp210200en.pdf. |
Pending Cases |
Case C-680/21, Free MovementUL, SA Royal Antwerp Football Club – v – Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL, reference lodged by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) on 11 November 2021 |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 4 2021 |
Keywords | Free Movement |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3 2021 |
Keywords | intimate partner violence, stalking, protection orders, empowerment, safety, well-being |
Authors | Irma W.M. Cleven |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This study uses a novel approach to understand the experience and meaning of unsafety and the contribution of penal protection orders to victim empowerment in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV). In ten in-depth interviews, IPV survivors reflect on their relationship with their ex-partner and the previous years in which the order against their ex-partner was issued, including its role within the wider process of coming to terms with IPV victimisation and moving on. Depending on expectations of protection orders (POs) enforcement and deterrence, POs enhance one’s safety-related self-efficacy and result in a sense of empowerment. Its meaning can be understood in terms of one’s power from the ex-partner, power to act, status vis-à-vis the offender and the wider community, care/help of the CJS, and unity/togetherness with the wider community. Several implications for theoretical and empirical research and practice are discussed. |