A question that has preoccupied sociolegal scholars for ages is whether law can change ‘hearts and minds’. This article explores whether non-discrimination law can create social change, and, more particularly, whether it can change attitudes and beliefs as well as external behaviour. The first part examines how sociolegal scholars have theorised about the possibility and desirability of using law as an instrument of social change. The second part discusses the findings of empirical research on the social working of various types of non-discrimination law. What conclusions can be drawn about the ability of non-discrimination law to create social change? What factors influence this ability? And can non-discrimination law change people’s hearts and minds as well as their behaviour? The research literature does not provide an unequivocal answer to the latter question. However, the overall picture emerging from the sociolegal literature is that law is generally more likely to bring about changes in external behaviour and that it can influence attitudes and beliefs only indirectly, by altering the situations in which attitudes and opinions are formed. |
Search result: 830 articles
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | law and society, social change, discrimination, non-discrimination law, positive action |
Authors | Anita Böcker |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
|
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | contracts, sales, law reform, CISG, UNIDROIT Principles, Argentina, France, comparative law |
Authors | Edgardo Muñoz and Inés Morfín Kroepfly |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Argentine and the French civil codes have recently undergone substantial modifications to their contract law provisions. These novel statutes could serve as models for future B2B contract law reforms in Latin American jurisdictions and beyond, as former Argentine and French laws have done in the past. The authors offer a contribution that paves the way in that direction with a systematic comparative analysis. As a starting point, this article unveils the influence that the modern unified laws on contracts (UNIDROIT Principles on International Commercial Contracts (PICC) and United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods of 1980 (CISG)) have in Argentina’s and France’s new contract law. It also highlights the most obvious similarities and differences in both sets of rules. This contribution goes beyond simple tertium comparisons; the authors analyse which of the two laws offers better, or more effective, rules to achieve the desired contract law functions in various matters. Readers are provided with the best rule or solution to address the problem in question and, as the authors hope, they should conclude that both models provide for a range of complementary solutions for modern contract law reforms. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | company takeovers, mandatory offers, minority shareholders, equal treatment, acquisition procedure |
Authors | Paul Nkoane |
AbstractAuthor's information |
A firm intention announcement must be made when the offeror is able and willing to acquire securities, and when a mandatory offer must be made. When the firm intention announcement is implemented, some sort of a contract is created. This rule has helped to determine the particular time the offeror should be liable to minorities. The question of when the offeror should bear the obligation to implement mandatory offers in aborted takeovers is thus no more problematic. Previously, the courts wrestled with this issue, but delivered what appears to be unsatisfactory decisions. This article will discuss the effect of a firm intention announcement and the responsibility that attends the making of that announcement. It intends to illustrate the extent of liability the offeror must bear in the event of a lapsed takeover, before and after the making of the firm intention announcement. The article examines the manner in which takeover rules can be enforced, and whether the current measures afford minorities proper protection. This brings to light the issue of equal treatment in takeovers and the fallacy thereof. A minor appraisal of the takeover rules in two jurisdictions in Europe (the United Kingdom and the Netherlands) is conducted to assess how equal treatment for minorities is promoted. Due to the difficulty minorities may experience in enforcing equal treatment in company takeovers, the article advocates for the alteration of the current South African takeover procedure for the promotion of minorities’ interests and for establishing rules that provide the offeror adequate information. |
Case Reports |
2020/23 The Supreme Court reiterates the importance of retention of an organizational and functional link between the business factors transferred, a prerequisite in the existence of a transfer of undertaking (GR) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of undertakings, Transfer |
Authors | Effie Mitsopoulou |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Greek Supreme Court, in a case about the transfer of a business and the obligation on the transferee to continue employing the transferred employees, underlined the importance of a thorough and genuine control on all factors to be taken into consideration in order to conclude on the existence of a transfer of undertaking or not: the business transferred must retain an autonomous economic identity, in the sense that the functional link between the different factors transferred is retained, thus allowing the new entity to use them in order to exercise an economic activity identical or similar to the previous one. |
Pending Cases |
Case C-40/20, Fixed-term WorkAQ, BO, CP – v – Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca – MIUR, Università degli studi di Perugia, reference lodged by the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) on 27 January 2020 |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Fixed-term Work |
Case Reports |
2020/24 Transfer of actual control decisive for a transfer of undertaking, despite limited transfer of assets (NL) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of Undertakings, Transfer |
Authors | Zef Even and Eva Poutsma |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Within the context of a transfer of undertaking in an asset reliant group of companies, the court should not just focus on whether the assets have been transferred between the two separate group companies, but also on whether one group company had actual control over the operation of the other group company. |
Pending Cases |
Case C-135/20, Fixed-term WorkJS – v – Câmara Municipal de Gondomar, reference lodged by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) on 12 March 2020 |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Fixed-term Work |
Case Reports |
2020/19 Relationship between time of notification of collective redundancies and time of notice of termination (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Collective Dismissal |
Authors | Marcus Bertz |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The notice of collective redundancies required to be given to an employment agency pursuant to Section 17(1) of the German Protection Against Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, ‘KSchG’) can only be effectively submitted if the employer has already decided to terminate the employment contract at the time of its receipt by the employment agency. Notices of termination in collective redundancy proceedings are therefore effective – subject to the fulfilment of any other notice requirements – if the proper notice is received by the competent employment agency before the employee has received the letter of termination. |
Landmark Rulings |
ECJ 26 March 2020, case C-344/18 (ISS Facility Services), Transfer of undertakings, transfer, employment termsISS Facility Services NV – v – Sonia Govaerts and Atalian NV (formerly Euroclean NV), Belgian case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of undertakings, Employment terms, Transfer |
Abstract |
In case of a transfer of undertaking involving multiple transferees, the rights and obligations arising from an employment contract may be divided between various transferees, if this is possible. If not (or if it is to the detriment of the employee), the transferees would be regarded as being responsible for any consequent termination under Article 4 of Directive 2001/23, even if this were to be initiated by the worker. |
Rulings |
ECJ 25 June 2020, case C-570/18 P (HF – v – Parliament), Health and SafetyHF- v – European Parliament, EU Case |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Health and Safety |
Abstract |
Within the context of a claim of psychological harassment, based on Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the EP’s Director-General for Personnel should have provided claimant at the least with a summary of the records of witness hearings drafted by the Advisory Committee. The annulment of the decision at issue constitutes appropriate compensation for any non-material damage which the appellant may have suffered in the present case. |
Article |
Unlocking the Sixth Committee’s Potential to Act for Crimes Against Humanity as It Did for Genocide |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | crimes against humanity, General Assembly, International Law Commission, Sixth Committee, United Nations |
Authors | Michael Imran Kanu |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The International Law Commission, on completion of its work on the draft articles on prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity, recommended to the General Assembly the elaboration of a convention by the said Assembly or by an international conference of plenipotentiaries based on the said draft articles. The Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly at the first opportunity only took note of the draft articles and postponed consideration of the recommendation to its next session. The resolution of the General Assembly, as recommended by the Sixth Committee, does not readily disclose the full extent of the debate, proposals and concerns expressed in the Sixth Committee that prevented the General Assembly from acting on the Commission’s recommendation. This article, in considering the cornucopia of views expressed by States, outlines a path to unlock the Sixth Committee’s potential to act, by proposing a separation of the organizational and substantive matters and future-proofing the further consideration of elaborating a convention through the adoption of a structured approach. |
Article |
The Elusive Quest for Digital Exhaustion in the US and the EUThe CJEU’s Tom Kabinet Ruling a Milestone or Millstone for Legal Evolution? |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | digital exhaustion, Tom Kabinet, UsedSoft, ReDigi, copyright law |
Authors | Shubha Ghosh and Péter Mezei |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The CJEU published its much-awaited preliminary ruling in Case C-263/18 - Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers (the Tom Kabinet case) in December 2019. Our paper aims to introduce the Tom Kabinet ruling and discuss its direct and indirect consequences in copyright law. The Tom Kabinet ruling has seriously limited (in fact, outruled) the resale of lawfully acquired e-books. It left various questions unanswered, and thus missed the opportunity to provide for clarity and consistency in digital copyright law. Our analysis addresses how the CJEU deferred from its own logic developed in the UsedSoft decision on the resale of lawfully acquired computer programs, and how the CJEU’s conservative approach ultimately missed the opportunity to reach a compromise ruling. The paper further introduces the US approach that has a strong distinction between selling and making with respect to the research of exhaustion. We aim to trace how this distinction rests on the statutory basis for exhaustion (in copyright) and common law basis (in patent and trademark law) and compare these findings with the CJEU’s recent interpretation of exhaustion. Our focus will be on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Kirstaeng and Bowman and lower court decisions that examine technological solutions to facilitate resale. We examine how the US approach adopts a rigid approach that might inhibit technological development in digital markets, an approach with parallels in the Tom Kabinet ruling. In conclusion, we assess whether there is convergence between the two sides of the Atlantic or whether there is a path of innovative legal development that reconciles the various precedents. |
Article |
National Courts and the Enforcement of EU LawHungarian Experiences |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | Constitutional Court of Hungary, supremacy, mutual trust, constitutional identity, preliminary ruling |
Authors | András Osztovits and András Zs. Varga |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The present study was originally meant for the FIDE XXIX Congress, which provided an excellent opportunity to review how the acquis communautaire has been implemented by ordinary courts as well as the Constitutional Court of Hungary since the country’s accession to the EU. As it is widely known, national courts play a key role in enforcing rights and obligations under EU law, so that the application of EU law remains uniform in all the Member States, in compliance with the jurisprudence of the CJEU. On the other hand, national constitutional courts must take a position more frequently and emphatically on issues related to national sovereignty: in defining what comes within the scope of the EU’s legislative competence and what remains under the control of national constitutional and legislative power. The relationship between national ordinary courts, constitutional courts and the CJEU, as well as the national implementation of Luxembourg case-law may be analyzed in a variety of ways and from different perspectives. The main principles governing EU law (such as direct effect, supremacy, mutual trust) have been developed in increasing detail over the years. Since their effect and practical consequences are outstanding, in what follows, we are shall explore these issues first in the light of Hungarian case-law. In the context of the principle of mutual trust, the discussion surrounding the independence of national courts is gaining impetus. Therefore, we will also touch upon this issue in our study. Finally, as far as the issue of effective enforcement of EU law is concerned, we shall present the Hungarian experience related to the preliminary ruling procedure, which is the most important element linking the CJEU and national courts. In this respect, we approach the issue from the domestic angle, focusing primarily on how exceptions to the obligation to submit a request for preliminary ruling have been clarified on the basis of the guidelines of the Curia of Hungary and the Constitutional Court of Hungary. |
Editorial |
Editorial Comments: The Relevance of Foreign Investment Protection in International and EU LawForeword to Vol. 8 (2020) of the Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
Author's information |
Literature Review |
Csongor István Nagy, Collective Actions in Europe. A Comparative, Economic and Transsystemic Analysis (Book Review)Springer, 2019, 132 p, ISBN 978-3-030-24221-3, ISBN 978-3-030-24222-0 (eBook) |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | András Tóth |
Author's information |
Case Reports |
2020/38 Supreme Court rules on the principle of continuity of civil service law in connection with a transfer of undertaking (FI) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of Undertakings, Employees Who Transfer, Dismissal/Severance Payment |
Authors | Janne Nurminen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Finnish Supreme Court has overturned a Court of Appeal decision regarding a transfer of a municipal civil servant to a company during the privatization of a public utility company. The Supreme Court held that an employment relationship had not been established between the transferee and the unlawfully dismissed municipal civil servant despite the principle of continuity of civil service law. The concrete actions of the transferee had an important role in defining that no employment relationship had been constituted between the dismissed municipal civil servant and the private company. |
Case Reports |
2020/35 Employment contract for an indefinite term with exclusion of work and remuneration for a certain period is valid and does not conflict with the law on fixed-term work (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Fixed-Term Work |
Authors | Othmar K. Traber |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Federal Labour Court of Germany (Bundesarbeitsgericht, ‘BAG’) had to decide on a case in which an employee argued that his contract was not terminated by a provision that restricted the mutual duties to a certain time period for the yearly season within his contract and that the employer had to employ him during the off season. However, his lawsuit was unsuccessful as the Court found that, even though he did have an indefinite contract, the employer was not obliged to employ and pay him during the off season due to the valid provision of fixed-term employment for the time from April to October during the time of the season. |
Article |
2020/28 The posting of workers: An EU and Slovak Republic perspective |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Posting of Workers |
Authors | Benita Korosiová and Gabriel Havrilla |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article discusses some of the problems with the Slovak implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive. |
Pending Cases |
Case C-265/20, Fixed-Term Work, Part Time WorkFN – v – Universiteit Antwerpen and Others, reference lodged by the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) on 15 June 2020 |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Fixed-Term Work, Part Time Work |
Case Reports |
2020/43 ECJ clarifies ‘worker’ status under EU law in gig economy ruling (UK) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Employment Status |
Authors | Colin Leckey |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that, while it is for national courts to make decisions about employment status, a courier working for Yodel in the UK appeared to have been correctly classified as self-employed, given the latitude he had over accepting jobs, working for competitors, providing substitutes and deciding his work schedule. The crucial factors were independence and subordination. |