The Law Commission of England and Wales is currently working to produce a New Sentencing Code that will seek to remedy problems with one of the most heavily used and unsatisfactory areas of statutory law. It responds to the problems of complexity and inaccessibility in the current sentencing legislation, and more fundamentally in the process by which sentencing legislation is created and implemented. The aim is to introduce the new Code as a consolidation Bill in 2018 with a view to it being in force from early 2019. This article provides an overview of the problems endemic to the current law and how the Commission envisages that the new Sentencing Code will provide not only a remedy, but a lasting one. |
Search result: 3 articles
Article |
Time for a Code: Reform of Sentencing Law in England and Wales |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2017 |
Keywords | Law Commission, codification, consolidation, consultation, criminal procedure |
Authors | Harry O’Sullivan and David Ormerod |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Editorial |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 1 2015 |
Article |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 1 2015 |
Keywords | directors’ disqualification, directors’ liability, fraud, company law, insolvency law |
Authors | Tom Reker |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In response to the effects of the global financial crisis on bankruptcy tendencies and the role of fraudulent company directors within that context, the Dutch government has introduced a proposal for a civil law directors’ disqualification instrument. This proposal aims to prevent both fraudulent conduct (by barring directors) and financial harm to corporate stakeholders, as well as to safeguard competitiveness and the trust which is necessary for effective trade. The fact that Dutch criminal law already allows for disqualification of directors in certain circumstances, which are partly similar to those in the proposal, raises doubts about the necessity of a civil law equivalent. This article concludes that the current proposal seems to have lost value vis-à-vis an earlier draft due to alterations to the disqualification and exculpation criteria, which may result in an overlap of the civil law and criminal law instruments. Consequently, there is a more pressing need for demarcation and reallocation of certain aspects of the proposal. By comparing the proposal with foreign (UK, US, Australian and German) counterparts, several suggestions are formulated to both counteract the overlap which the proposal may cause in Dutch law and to contribute to a model of effective disqualification instruments in general. |