The global financial crisis of 2008 and the following public uproar over offshore tax evasion and corporate aggressive tax planning scandals gave rise to unprecedented international cooperation on tax information exchange and coordination on corporate tax reforms. At the behest of the G20, the OECD developed a comprehensive package of ‘consensus-based’ policy reform measures aimed to curb base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) by multinationals and to restore fairness and coherence to the international tax system. The legitimacy of the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, however, has been widely challenged. This paper explores the validity of the legitimacy concerns raised by the various stakeholders regarding the OECD/G20 BEPS Project. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2017 |
Keywords | base erosion and profit shifting, OECD, G20, legitimacy, international tax reform |
Authors | Sissie Fung |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
The Reform and Harmonization of Commercial Laws in the East African Community |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2017 |
Keywords | law reform, harmonization of laws, commercial laws, legal transplants, East African Community |
Authors | Agasha Mugasha |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The partner states in the East African Community (EAC) have modernized their commercial laws to claim their post-colonial identity and facilitate development. While law reform and the harmonization of laws are both methods of shaping laws, the national law reform programmes in the EAC mainly aim to ensure that the laws reflect the domestic socioeconomic circumstances, in contrast to the harmonization of national commercial laws, which focuses on the attainment of economic development. This article observes that the reformed and harmonized commercial laws in the EAC are mainly legal transplants of the principles of transnational commercial law that have been adapted to meet domestic needs and aspirations. |
Article |
The Legitimacy of Final Statements and Reports of National Contact PointsAn Empirical Analysis of (Final) Statements and Reports of the UK, US and Dutch National Contact Point of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001-2016) |
Journal | Corporate Mediation Journal, Issue 2 2017 |
Authors | Sander van ’t Foort, Vivan IJzerman, Jasmin Lagziel e.a. |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3 2017 |
Keywords | same-sex marriage, gay marriage, European consensus, margin of appreciation, consensus-based analysis by the ECtHR |
Authors | Masuma Shahid |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This contribution assesses the consensus-based analysis and reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in recent judgments concerning equal marriage rights and compares it to the Court’s past jurisprudence on European consensus and the margin of appreciation awarded to Member States regarding the issue of equal marriage rights. The contribution aims to analyse whether there is a parallel to be seen between the rapid global trend of legalisation of same-sex marriage and the development or evolution of the case law of the ECtHR on the same topic. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the Court’s consensus-based analysis is problematic for several reasons and provides possible alternative approaches to the balancing of the Court between, on the one hand, protecting rights of minorities (in this case same-sex couples invoking equal marriage rights) under the European Convention on Human Rights and, on the other hand, maintaining its credibility, authority and legitimacy towards Member States that might disapprove of the evolving case law in the context of same-sex relationships. It also offers insights as to the future of European consensus in the context of equal marriage rights and ends with some concluding remarks. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3 2017 |
Keywords | access to justice, procedural law, courts, civil justice reform, comparative law |
Authors | Catherine Piché |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Canada has a complex system of courts that seek to serve Canadians in view of the traditional objectives of civil justice – principally accessibility, efficiency, fairness, efficacy, proportionality and equality. The Canadian court system is generally considered by its users to work well and to have legitimacy. Yet, researchers have found that ‘there is a tendency for people involved in a civil case to become disillusioned about the ability of the system to effect a fair and timely resolution to a civil justice problem’. This article will discuss the ways in which reforms of procedural law and civil justice have originated and continue to be made throughout Canada, both nationally and provincially, as well as the trends and influences in making these reforms. With hundreds of contemporary procedural reforms having been discussed, proposed and/or completed since the first days of Canadian colonisation on a national basis and in the Canadian provinces and territory, providing a detailed analysis will prove challenging. This article will nonetheless provide a review of civil justice and procedural reform issues in Canada, focusing principally, at the provincial level, on the systems of Ontario and Quebec. Importantly, I will seek to reconcile the increasing willingness to have an economically efficient civil justice and the increased power of judges in managing cases, with our court system’s invasion of ADR and its prioritisation of informal modes of adjudication. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3 2017 |
Keywords | ECtHR, UNHRC, religious manifestations, religious minorities, empirical analysis |
Authors | Fabienne Bretscher |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Confronted with cases of restrictions of the right to manifest religious beliefs of new religious minorities formed by recent migration movements, the ECtHR and the UNHRC seem to opt for different interpretations and applications of this right, as recent conflicting decisions show. Based on an empirical legal analysis of the two bodies’ decisions on individual complaints, this article finds that these conflicting decisions are part of a broader divergence: While the UNHRC functions as a protector of new minorities against States’ undue interference in their right to manifest their religion, the ECtHR leaves it up to States how to deal with religious diversity brought by new minorities. In addition, a quantitative analysis of the relevant case law showed that the ECtHR is much less likely to find a violation of the right to freedom of religion in cases brought by new religious minorities as opposed to old religious minorities. Although this could be a hint towards double standards, a closer look at the examined case law reveals that the numerical differences can be explained by the ECtHR’s weaker protection of religious manifestations in the public as opposed to the private sphere. Yet, this rule has an important exception: Conscientious objection to military service. By examining the development of the relevant case law, this article shows that this exception bases on a recent alteration of jurisprudence by the ECtHR and that there are similar prospects for change regarding other religious manifestations in the public sphere. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2017 |
Keywords | empirical legal studies, apologies, procedural justice, humiliation, victim rights |
Authors | Vincent Geeraets and Wouter Veraart |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The central question in this article is whether an empirical-legal approach of victimhood and victim rights could offer a sufficient basis for proposals of legal reform of the legal system. In this article, we choose a normative-critical approach and raise some objections to the way in which part of such research is currently taking place in the Netherlands, on the basis of two examples of research in this field, one dealing with compelled apologies as a possible remedy within civil procedural law and the other with the victim’s right to be heard within the criminal legal procedure. In both cases, we argue, the strong focus on the measurable needs of victims can lead to a relatively instrumental view of the legal system. The legal system must then increasingly be tailored to the wishes and needs of victims. Within this legal-empirical, victim-oriented approach, there is little regard for the general normative principles of our present legal system, in which an equal and respectful treatment of each human being as a free and responsible legal subject is a central value. We argue that results of empirical-legal research should not too easily or too quickly be translated into proposals for legal reform, but first become part of a hermeneutical discussion about norms and legal principles, specific to the normative quality of legal science itself. |
Article |
The Law of Consumer Redress in an Evolving Digital MarketUpgrading from Alternative to Online Dispute Resolution |
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 2 2017 |
Keywords | e-Commerce, Online Dispute Resolution, Alternative Dispute Resolution, consumer redress |
Authors | Pablo Cortés |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article contains the Introduction of a book with the same title recently published by Cambridge University Press, which is reproduced here with its permission. The book offers an updated analysis of the various consumer dispute resolution processes, its laws and best practices, which are collectively referred as the Law of Consumer Redress. The book argues that many consumer redress systems, and in particular publicly certified Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) entities, are more than a mere dispute resolution mechanism as they provide a public service for consumers that complements, and often replaces, the role of the courts. In examining the current redress models (i.e., public enforcement, private enforcement and other market options), the book calls for greater integration amongst these various redress options. It also advocates, inter alia, for processes that encourage parties to participate in ADR processes, settle meritorious claims and ensure extrajudicial enforcement of final outcomes. Lastly, the book calls for a more efficient rationalization of certified ADR entities, which should be better coordinated and accessible through technological means. |
Article |
European Regulation on Online Dispute ResolutionA Comment on Its Enforcement in Italy |
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 2 2017 |
Keywords | European Regulation, ODR, ADR, Italian enforcement |
Authors | Rebecca Berto |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The European single market is a symbol of European integration. Certainly, the European internal market brings great opportunities to its citizens and professionals, especially when the European legislators enact new provisions in order to boost the internal market. |
Article |
Therapeutic Justice and Vaccination Compliance |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 1 2017 |
Keywords | public health, trust, vaccination, health law, health policy |
Authors | Shelly Kamin-Friedman |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Recent decades have witnessed the appearance of multiple grounds for vaccine hesitancy. One of the options to deal with this phenomenon is legislative. Given that vaccination enforcement through law raises allegations of infringement of constitutional rights, interventions seeking to promote vaccination compliance should rather address the factors that influence vaccine hesitancy, which are – by and large – related to trust in health authorities. Trust in health authorities may be promoted by a procedure for compensating the comparatively few vaccination victims reflecting a willingness to acknowledge liability and commitment to social justice. |
Article |
Intersecting ProfessionsA Public Health Perspective on Law to Address Health Care Conflicts |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 1 2017 |
Keywords | public health, Alternative Dispute Resolution, public law, health promotion |
Authors | Michal Alberstein and Nadav Davidovitch PhD |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This paper examines the intersection between the two professions – law and medicine – with reference to systematic transformations that have characterized their development in the past century. In particular, the paper examines the co-emergence of the new public health and health promotion scholarship along with the development of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) movement in the second half of the 20th century. The two movements, with their later developments, have aspired to change the focus of professionals in the field, and both have been tremendously successful on the one hand, and on the other have remained marginal to mainstream training and identity building of contemporary lawyers and doctors. |
Article |
Global, International and State Dimensions of MigrationProblems of International/Domestic Enforcement |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2017 |
Authors | Ielyzaveta Lvova |
Author's information |
Article |
IHL and Human Rights Law: Relationship |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2017 |
Authors | Christine Byron |
Author's information |
Article |
Freedom of Religion at the WorkplaceBackground to the Ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Achbita and Bougnaoui Cases |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2017 |
Authors | János Tamás Czigle |
Author's information |
Article |
French Constitution, Droit Administratif and the Civil Code |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 3 2017 |
Keywords | Droit Administratif, Civil Code, Conseil d’État, public order |
Authors | Zia Akhtar |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Droit Administratif in France is a separate branch of law that exists in parallel to the civil and criminal law. The law has been developed from the concept of separation of powers that is ingrained in the French constitution. Its concepts derive from the Code civil that is implemented in France since its inception in the Napoleonic era and this has undergone reform that has made the role of the judges more interventionist. The highest administrative court is the Conseil d’État, which is at the apex of the machinery of administrative courts that are an important part of public law’s discourse and there is a hierarchy of courts that consider appeals and regulate the norms of conduct of state officials towards the citizens. The judges receive induction and training before taking on the role of occupation and that has been inculcated in the French administrative court judges. This article looks at the separate system of administrative law and its success in preserving the necessary checks and balances in the constitution, which it is intended to protect. This is an examination of the developing concept of French justice, the doctrine of separation of powers and civil procedural changes that enable the grievance of citizens against officials to be heard more expeditiously. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 1 2017 |
Keywords | flawed legislation, tax privileges, tax planning, corporate social responsibility, tax professionals |
Authors | Hans Gribnau |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 1 2017 |
Keywords | Fairness, international tax, legitimacy, BEPS, developing countries |
Authors | Irene Burgers and Irma Mosquera |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The aim of this article is to examine the differences in perception of ‘fairness’ between developing and developed countries, which influence developing countries’ willingness to embrace the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) proposals and to recommend as to how to overcome these differences. The article provides an introduction to the background of the OECD’s BEPS initiatives (Action Plan, Low Income Countries Report, Multilateral Framework, Inclusive Framework) and the concerns of developing countries about their ability to implement BEPS (Section 1); a non-exhaustive overview of the shortcomings of the BEPS Project and its Action Plan in respect of developing countries (Section 2); arguments on why developing countries might perceive fairness in relation to corporate income taxes differently from developed countries (Section 3); and recommendations for international organisations, governments and academic researchers on where fairness in respect of developing countries should be more properly addressed (Section 4). |
Article |
Consultations, Citizen Narratives and Evidence-Based RegulationThe Strange Case of the Consultation on the Collaborative Economy |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 1-2 2017 |
Keywords | Better Regulation, consultations, evidence-based lawmaking, sharing economy, narratives |
Authors | Sofia Ranchordás |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The 2015 Better Regulation Communication advocates an evidence-based approach to regulation, which includes better consultations and broader civic engagement. In this article, I consider the recent EU public consultation on the regulatory environment of online platforms and the collaborative economy. I enquire in this context whether citizens were seriously regarded as evidence providers and how their knowledge that materialized in individual narratives could contribute to more legitimate and thus better regulation. I argue that an evidence-based approach to regulation should also include citizen narratives as they can provide first-hand and diverse perspectives, which might not be considered in standard consultation questions. I contend that citizen narratives can be particularly useful in complex and rapidly evolving fields where there is still little empirical evidence and where participants are likely to have diverse personal experiences. Drawing on the literature on narratives, I contend that this method of collecting information can help regulators identify new problems and structure solutions in rapidly changing and diverse regulatory fields such as the collaborative economy. |
Article |
Regulatory Review of European Commission Impact AssessmentsWhat Kind for Which Better Regulation Scenario? |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 1-2 2017 |
Keywords | impact assessment, Better Regulation, non-judicial review, regulatory scrutiny, European Union |
Authors | Anne C.M. Meuwese |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The article maps the various ways in which review of Commission impact assessments takes place by the Regulatory Scrutiny Board, the European Ombudsman, the European Court of Auditors, and the Court of Justice of the European Union, among others, and assesses the effect these review activities have on the framework and functioning of this primary Better Regulation tool. |
Article |
Why Better Regulation Demands Better Scrutiny of ResultsThe European Parliament’s Use of Performance Audits by the European Court of Auditors in ex post Impact Assessment |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 1-2 2017 |
Keywords | EU budget, European Parliamentary Research Service, policy evaluation, scrutiny, oversight |
Authors | Paul Stephenson |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Ex post impact assessment (traditionally considered part of policy evaluation) received less attention in the preceding ‘Better Regulation’ package (2011) than ex ante impact assessment. Yet, the insights generated through ex post impact assessment provide crucial input for streamlining legislation. In recognition of its contribution, the current agenda (2015) extends the reach to policy evaluation, and from financial instruments to regulatory instruments. In light of existing experience with impact assessments in Commission Directorates-General (DGs), the European Union (EU) institutions have been increasingly aware of the need to develop staff expertise in ex post (policy) evaluation, which has in the past been largely outsourced to external parties. Making sense of collected input and incorporating it within impact assessment is time consuming. Indeed, taking up the findings for practical use is a challenge for political decision makers but essential for the purposes of accountability, scrutiny and institutional learning. The challenge is more so, given the wealth of information being generated by multiple parties and the increasing technical and financial complexity of certain policy areas. The role of the Commission as an advocate of ‘Better Regulation’ has been studied extensively. However, we know relatively little about the role of the European Parliament (EP) in ex post evaluation. This article contributes to the literature on ‘Better Regulation in the EU’ by shedding light on the EP activities in the realm of scrutiny and evaluation. In particular, it looks at the Parliament’s use of special reports produced by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) through its performance audit work and how it takes on board the findings and recommendations in its scrutiny of budgetary spending. Moreover, it examines the emerging role of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) in monitoring the outputs of the ECA and other bodies engaged in audit and evaluation, and thereby, the way in which the EPRS is helping increase the Parliament’s capacity for scrutiny and oversight. |