This paper provides an account of what makes age discrimination special, going through a set of possible justifications. In the end, it turns out that a full understanding of the specialness of age-based differential treatment requires that we consider together the ‘reliable proxy,’ the ‘complete-life neutrality,’ the ‘sequence efficiency’ and the ‘affirmative egalitarian’ accounts. Depending on the specific age criteria, all four accounts may apply or only some of them. This is the first key message of this paper. The second message of the paper has to do with the age group/birth cohort distinction. All measures that have a differential impact on different cohorts also tend to have a differential impact on various age groups during the transition. The paper points at the practical implications of anti-age-discrimination law for differential treatment between birth cohorts. The whole argument is confronted all along with ECJ cases. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2014 |
Keywords | age discrimination, intergenerational justice, complete-life view, statistical discrimination, anti-discrimination law |
Authors | Axel Gosseries |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2014 |
Keywords | Arendt, asylum, refugeeship, right to have rights, statelessness de facto and de jure |
Authors | Nanda Oudejans |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article argues that the right to have rights, as launched by Hannah Arendt, is relative to refugee displacement and hence translates as a right to asylum. It takes issue with the dominant view that the public/private divide is the locus classicus of the meaning of this primordial right. A different direction of thought is proposed, proceeding from Arendt’s recovery of the spatiality of law. The unencompassibility of place in matters of rights, freedom and equality brings this right into view as a claim at the behest of those who have lost a legal place of their own. This also helps us to gain better understanding of Arendt’s rebuttal of the sharp-edged distinction between refugees and stateless persons and to discover the defiant potential of the right to have rights to illuminate the refugee’s claim to asylum as a claim to an own place where protection can be enjoyed again. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Keywords | rules, principles, fairness, PoI |
Authors | Magnus Ulväng |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In my response to Duff I focus mainly on the following two issues. Firstly, I examine what kind of a norm the presumption of innocence (PoI) really is and how it ontologically differs from other types of rules, principles, rationales, etc. My tentative conclusion is that a PoI does not suffice the requirement of being a dogmatic rule and, thus, has less weight than what Duff perhaps assumes. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2013 |
Keywords | jurisprudence, legal positivism, Hans Kelsen, pure theory of law |
Authors | Christoph Kletzer |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The paper argues that we miss the point and strength of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law if we take it to drive a middle way between reductionism and moralism. Rather conversely, the Pure Theory is a radical theory. It tries to overcome the opposition between reductionism and moralism by making clear that both opponents rest on the same ill-conceived convictions about legal validity. Both take it that the law cannot be normative by itself. In contrast, the Pure Theory tries to find a new approach to the understanding of law that takes seriously the constitutive functions of law. It tries to understand the validity of law as resting in law itself. As such it is an attempt to find a philosophically satisfactory formulation of what can be called absolute positivism. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2012 |
Keywords | democracy, radical freedom, free market economy, consumerism, collective action |
Authors | Steven L. Winter |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Two waves of democratization define the post-Cold War era of globalization. The first one saw democracies emerge in post-communist countries and post-Apartheid South Africa. The current wave began with the uprisings in the Middle East. The first focused on the formal institutions of the market and the liberal state, the second is participatory and rooted in collective action. The individualistic conception of freedom and democracy that underlies the first wave is false and fetishistic. The second wave shows democracy’s moral appeal is the commitment to equal participation in determining the terms and conditions of social life. Freedom, thus, requires collective action under conditions of equality, mutual recognition, and respect. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2012 |
Keywords | general jurisprudence, globalization, global legal pluralism, legal positivism, analytical jurisprudence |
Authors | Sidney Richards |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Globalization is commonly cited as an important factor in theorising legal phenomena in the contemporary world. Although many legal disciplines have sought to adapt their theories to globalization, progress has been comparatively modest within contemporary analytical jurisprudence. This paper aims to offer a survey of recent scholarship on legal theory and globalization and suggests various ways in which these writings are relevant to the project of jurisprudence. This paper argues, more specifically, that the dominant interpretation of globalization frames it as a particular form of legal pluralism. The resulting concept – global legal pluralism – comes in two broad varieties, depending on whether it emphasizes normative or institutional pluralism. This paper goes on to argue that these concepts coincide with two central themes of jurisprudence, namely its concern with normativity and institutionality. Finally, this paper reflects on the feasibility of constructing a ‘general’ and ‘descriptive’ jurisprudence in light of globalization. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2011 |
Keywords | fundamental rights, societal constitutionalism, inclusionary and exclusionary effects, anonymous matrix |
Authors | Gunther Teubner |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Violations of human rights by transnational corporations and by other ‘private’ global actors raise problems that signal the limits of the traditional doctrine of ‘horizontal effects’. To overcome them, constitutional law doctrine needs to be complemented by perspectives from legal theory and sociology of law. This allows new answers to the following questions: What is the validity basis of human rights in transnational ‘private’ regimes – extraterritorial effect, colère public or external pressures on autonomous law making in global regimes? Do they result in protective duties of the states or in direct human rights obligations of private transnational actors? What does it mean to generalise state-directed human rights and to respecify them for different social spheres? Are societal human rights limited to ‘negative’ rights or is institutional imagination capable of developing ‘positive’ rights – rights of inclusion and participation in various social fields? Are societal human rights directed exclusively against corporate actors or can they be extended to counteract structural violence of anonymous social processes? Can such broadened perspectives of human rights be re-translated into the practice of public interest litigation? |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2011 |
Keywords | ecological catastrophe, regulatory legitimacy, regulatory effectiveness, geo-engineering |
Authors | Han Somsen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article considers the question how knowledge of an impending ecological catastrophe is likely to impact on regulatory legitimacy and regulatory effectiveness. If the ultimate aim to safeguard meaningful human life on earth is in acute danger, this is likely to translate into zero tolerance towards non-compliance with environmental rules designed to avert catastrophe. This, in turn, will persuade regulators to employ normative technologies that do not engage with the moral reason of regulatees at all, but leave no option but to comply. In addition, regulators may turn to panoptic surveillance techniques that allow no breaches of rules to remain undetected. Finally, it is argued that if and to the extent that impending ecological catastrophe marks the end of maintaining the status quo as a plausible policy goal, regulators will be more sympathetic towards potentially apocalyptic technologies that carry greater promise for future gain than otherwise would be the case. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2010 |
Keywords | constitutionalism, globalization, democracy, modernity, postnational |
Authors | Neil Walker |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The complexity of the relationship between democracy and modern constitutionalism is revealed by treating democracy as an incomplete ideal. This refers both to the empirical incompleteness of democracy as unable to supply its own terms of application – the internal dimension – and to the normative incompleteness of democracy as guide to good government – the external dimension. Constitutionalism is a necessary response to democratic incompleteness – seeking to realize (the internal dimension) and to supplement and qualify democracy (the external dimension). How democratic incompleteness manifests itself, and how constitutionalism responds to incompleteness evolves and alters, revealing the relationship between constitutionalism and democracy as iterative. The paper concentrates on the iteration emerging from the current globalizing wave. The fact that states are no longer the exclusive sites of democratic authority compounds democratic incompleteness and complicates how constitutionalism responds. Nevertheless, the key role of constitutionalism in addressing the double incompleteness of democracy persists under globalization. This continuity reflects how the deep moral order of political modernity, in particular the emphasis on individualism, equality, collective agency and progress, remains constant while its institutional architecture, including the forms of its commitment to democracy, evolves. Constitutionalism, itself both a basic orientation and a set of design principles for that architecture, remains a necessary support for and supplement to democracy. Yet post-national constitutionalism, even more than its state-centred predecessor, remains contingent upon non-democratic considerations, so reinforcing constitutionalism’s normative and sociological vulnerability. This conclusion challenges two opposing understandings of the constitutionalism of the global age – that which indicts global constitutionalism because of its weakened democratic credentials and that which assumes that these weakened democratic credentials pose no problem for post-national constitutionalism, which may instead thrive through a heightened emphasis on non-democratic values. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2010 |
Keywords | Kelsen, Democracy, Legitimacy, European Union, European Court of Justice |
Authors | Quoc Loc Hong |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article draws on Hans Kelsen’s theory of democracy to argue that, contrary to conventional wisdom, there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the democratic legitimacy of either the European Union (EU) or the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The legitimacy problems from which the EU in general and the ECJ in particular are alleged to suffer seem to result mainly from our rigid adherence to the outdated conception of democracy as popular self-legislation. Because we tend to approach the Union’s political and judicial practice from the perspective of this democracy conception, we are not able to observe what is blindingly obvious, that is, the viability and persistence of both this mega-leviathan and the highest court thereof. It is, therefore, imperative that we modernize and adjust our conception of democracy in order to comprehend the new reality to which these bodies have given rise, rather than to call for ‘reforms’ in a futile attempt to bring this reality into accordance with our ancient preconceptions about what democratic governance ought to be. Kelsen is the democratic theorist whose work has enabled us to venture into that direction. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2009 |
Keywords | normative positivism, historic injustice, restitution of property rights, citation of foreign law, methodology debate |
Authors | Kees Quist and Wouter Veraart |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This interview with Jeremy Waldron covers three topics. Firstly, we dealt with the methodology debate, that is, the discussion about how to proceed in analyzing the nature of law. Does the question ‘What is law?’ require a descriptive analysis of the concept of law or, rather, a normative exercise in political philosophy? Secondly, we spoke about the role of law in response to historic injustice, especially in relation to the restitution of property rights. On this topic Waldron vindicates the ‘supersession-thesis’, the idea that, due to changed circumstances and the passage of time, historic injustices become superseded. The third section of the interview is devoted to Waldron’s perspective on the citation of foreign law by national judges. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2008 |
Keywords | claim, character, know-how, machine, model, reputatie, service, settlement, binding |
Authors | B. Honig |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2008 |
Keywords | claim, contract, interest, character, making, binding, E-business, Europese gemeenschap, identiteit, leasing |
Authors | H. Lindahl |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2007 |
Keywords | claim, bank, elektronisch geld, kind, leasing, concern, houdstervennootschap, introductie, making, model |
Authors | R. Janse and J.M. Piret |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2006 |
Keywords | claim, character, identiteit, reputatie, computer, leasing, making, media |
Authors | R. Pierik |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2006 |
Keywords | claim, contract, leasing, character, kind, model, computer, concern, hergebruik van afvalstoffen, identificatie |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2006 |
Keywords | claim, model, baby, carry, gedogen, identiteit, interest, kind, mededinging, service |
Authors | A. Zijderveld |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 2 2005 |
Keywords | claim, arrangement, contract, kind, making |
Authors | B. Klink |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2005 |
Keywords | identiteit, geschrift, student, claim, echtgenoot, echtgenote, identificatie, kwaliteit, levering, merk |
Authors | M. Adams |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2004 |
Keywords | kind, contract, gift, arrangement, leasing, observer, as low as reasonably achievable, elektronisch geld, interest, machine |
Authors | P. Westerman |