The Greek Supreme Court, in a case about the transfer of a business and the obligation on the transferee to continue employing the transferred employees, underlined the importance of a thorough and genuine control on all factors to be taken into consideration in order to conclude on the existence of a transfer of undertaking or not: the business transferred must retain an autonomous economic identity, in the sense that the functional link between the different factors transferred is retained, thus allowing the new entity to use them in order to exercise an economic activity identical or similar to the previous one. |
Case Reports |
2020/23 The Supreme Court reiterates the importance of retention of an organizational and functional link between the business factors transferred, a prerequisite in the existence of a transfer of undertaking (GR) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of undertakings, Transfer |
Authors | Effie Mitsopoulou |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Case Reports |
2020/18 Prohibition of dismissal of pregnant employee (RO) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Gender discrimination |
Authors | Andreea Suciu and Teodora Mănăilă |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Analysing the national legal framework in relation to the protection of pregnant employees and employees who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding, provisions which transposed the regulations of Directive 92/85/EEC and of the conclusions in case C-103/16, Jessica Porras Guisado – v – Bankia S.A. and Others, the Constitutional Court of Romania ascertained that the dismissal prohibition of a pregnant employee is strictly restricted to reasons that have a direct connection with the employee’s pregnancy status. As for other cases where the termination of the employment contract is the result of disciplinary misconduct, unexcused absence from work, non-observance of labour discipline, or termination of employment for economic reasons or collective redundancies, the employer must submit in writing well-reasoned grounds for dismissal. |
The Greek Supreme Court in Plenary Session, in a long-awaited decision, has ruled that an employee who has not been able to exercise his right to annual leave due to long-term sick leave is still entitled to his paid annual leave as well as to annual leave allowance. |
Case Reports |
2020/24 Transfer of actual control decisive for a transfer of undertaking, despite limited transfer of assets (NL) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of Undertakings, Transfer |
Authors | Zef Even and Eva Poutsma |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Within the context of a transfer of undertaking in an asset reliant group of companies, the court should not just focus on whether the assets have been transferred between the two separate group companies, but also on whether one group company had actual control over the operation of the other group company. |
Case Reports |
2020/26 Entitlement to allowance in lieu of untaken paid annual leave had lapsed because of garden leave (NL) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Paid Leave |
Authors | Lisa de Vries and Jan-Pieter Vos |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Applying the ECJ’s Maschek judgment, the Zutphen subdistrict court has found that an employee was not entitled to an allowance in lieu of untaken paid annual leave at the end of the employment relationship, as she had already received special leave. Moreover, the obligation to inform the employee concerning the right to (exercise) paid annual leave did not rest upon the employer. |
Case Reports |
2020/17 Capping of redundancy allowance in view of (future) entitlement to early retirement pension (NL) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Authors | Albertine Veldman |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands has quashed a verdict of the Court of Appeal that held that a social plan provision stipulating the capping of a redundancy allowance in view of an entitlement to early retirement pension was invalid because of age discrimination. According to the Supreme Court, a more marginal justification test should have been applied to a social plan. The Court of Appeal, moreover, did not consider all the legitimate aims it specified and should also have taken additional social plan measures as well as pension measures from the past into account. By not doing so, it was not properly examined whether the social plan constituted age discrimination. |
Case Reports |
2020/14 Sickness absence related to employee’s disability (DK) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal |
Authors | Christian K. Clasen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Recently, the Danish Eastern High Court found that an employee’s sickness absence was a result of the employer’s failure to comply with its obligation to offer reasonable accommodation for the employee’s disability. For that reason the employee, who was dismissed in pursuance of the Danish ‘120-day rule’, was entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal under the Danish Anti-Discrimination Act. |
Case Reports |
2020/21 Employer not liable for misuse of personal data by ‘rogue’ employee (UK) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Privacy |
Authors | Richard Lister |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal by one of the UK’s major supermarket chains, overturning a finding that it was vicariously liable for a rogue employee’s deliberate disclosure of payroll data related to some 100,000 co-workers, of whom 10,000 brought a group claim for damages. |
Case Reports |
2020/20 Dismissal unfair where decision-maker was not given accurate information (UK) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Unfair Dismissal |
Authors | Ludivine Gegaden |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The dismissal of an employee for gross misconduct was unfair because the investigating officer failed to share significant new information with the manager conducting the disciplinary hearing who decided to dismiss, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled. |
Case Reports |
2020/19 Relationship between time of notification of collective redundancies and time of notice of termination (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Collective Dismissal |
Authors | Marcus Bertz |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The notice of collective redundancies required to be given to an employment agency pursuant to Section 17(1) of the German Protection Against Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, ‘KSchG’) can only be effectively submitted if the employer has already decided to terminate the employment contract at the time of its receipt by the employment agency. Notices of termination in collective redundancy proceedings are therefore effective – subject to the fulfilment of any other notice requirements – if the proper notice is received by the competent employment agency before the employee has received the letter of termination. |
Case Reports |
2020/16 Nature and extent of ‘reasonable accommodation’ to be provided to employees with disabilities (IE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Disability Discrimination |
Authors | Orla O’Leary |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In a recent Supreme Court decision, it was held by a 4-1 majority that there is no reason, in principle, why the provision of ‘reasonable accommodation’ for an employee with a disability should not involve the redistribution of duties. |
Case Reports |
|
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Discrimination, general, Health and safety, Unfair dismissal |
Authors | Gautier Busschaert |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Belgian Court of Cassation (Supreme Court), in a decision of 20 January 2020, has ruled that the prohibition for an employer to terminate the employment relationship of a worker for reasons related to a complaint for acts of violence and/or moral and/or sexual harassment at work does not, however, preclude the dismissal from being justified by motives inferred from the facts set out in the complaint. |
Case Reports |
2020/15 Discrimination against severely disabled persons by the calculation of social plan compensation (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Disability Discrimination, Age Discrimination |
Authors | Iness Gutt |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Federal Labour Court of Germany (Bundesarbeitsgericht, ‘BAG’) has decided that a social plan that distinguished between employees who were born in 1960 or later and employees who were born before 1960 for the calculation of severance payment did not constitute unjustified age discrimination. However, a regulation in a social plan which referred to the “earliest possible” entitlement to a statutory pension when calculating the severance payment constituted unjustified indirect discrimination against disabled persons. |
Case Reports |
2020/22 Works council’s right to inspect remuneration lists (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Information and Consultation, Privacy |
Authors | Robert Pacholski |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, “BAG”) has held that a works council must be provided with the documents necessary for carrying out its duties at any time on request. A works committee or another committee of the works council formed in accordance with the provisions of the Works Constitution Act (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz, “BetrVG”) is entitled to inspect the lists of gross wages. This right to inspect is not limited to anonymized gross pay lists. Data protection considerations do not dictate that the right is limited to anonymized gross payrolls. The processing of personal data associated with the right of inspection is permitted under the European General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, “BDSG”). |
Case Reports |
2020/38 Supreme Court rules on the principle of continuity of civil service law in connection with a transfer of undertaking (FI) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Transfer of Undertakings, Employees Who Transfer, Dismissal/Severance Payment |
Authors | Janne Nurminen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Finnish Supreme Court has overturned a Court of Appeal decision regarding a transfer of a municipal civil servant to a company during the privatization of a public utility company. The Supreme Court held that an employment relationship had not been established between the transferee and the unlawfully dismissed municipal civil servant despite the principle of continuity of civil service law. The concrete actions of the transferee had an important role in defining that no employment relationship had been constituted between the dismissed municipal civil servant and the private company. |
Case Reports |
2020/40 Holiday entitlement in the release phase of partial retirement according to the so-called ‘block model’ (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Paid Leave, Part-time work, Pension |
Authors | Othmar K. Traber |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Federal Labour Court of Germany (Bundesarbeitsgericht, ‘BAG’) had to decide on a case in which an employee claimed vacation entitlements for the release phase of a partial retirement scheme. Because the employee was released from his work obligation during the release phase of the partial retirement under the so-called ‘block model’ he was not entitled to statutory leave so that the lawsuit was unsuccessful in the final instance. |
Case Reports |
2020/31 Comparing job descriptions is insufficient for checking whether work is equally valuable (BG) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Discrimination general |
Authors | Kalina Tchakarova |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Bulgarian Supreme Administrative Court in a decision of 24 June 2019 has ruled that the mere comparison between the job descriptions of employees is not sufficient basis for establishing whether the employees are carrying out the same work or work of equal value and the courts should also take into consideration the practical aspects of the work, the specific working conditions and the tasks actually carried out. |
Case Reports |
2020/32 Employee barred from claiming compensation under the Anti-Discrimination Act due to agreement in full and final settlement (DK) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Disability Discrimination, Discrimination General |
Authors | Christian K. Clasen |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Danish Western High Court recently found that an employee who had entered into a severance agreement – and who was represented by her professional organisation during this process – was barred from claiming compensation under the Danish Anti-Discrimination Act, implementing Directive 2000/78. |
Case Reports |
2020/35 Employment contract for an indefinite term with exclusion of work and remuneration for a certain period is valid and does not conflict with the law on fixed-term work (GE) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Fixed-Term Work |
Authors | Othmar K. Traber |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Federal Labour Court of Germany (Bundesarbeitsgericht, ‘BAG’) had to decide on a case in which an employee argued that his contract was not terminated by a provision that restricted the mutual duties to a certain time period for the yearly season within his contract and that the employer had to employ him during the off season. However, his lawsuit was unsuccessful as the Court found that, even though he did have an indefinite contract, the employer was not obliged to employ and pay him during the off season due to the valid provision of fixed-term employment for the time from April to October during the time of the season. |
Case Reports |
2020/34 Challenge to validity of Workplace Relations Act 2015 unsuccessful (IR) |
Journal | European Employment Law Cases, Issue 3 2020 |
Keywords | Unfair Dismissal, Fair Trial, Miscellaneous |
Authors | Orla O’Leary |
AbstractAuthor's information |
A recent challenge to the constitutionality of the Irish Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has failed. The applicant in the case at hand argued that the WRC was unconstitutional for two reasons: (a) that the WRC carries out the administration of justice in breach of the general constitutional rule that only the courts may administer justice; and (b) several of the statutory procedures of the WRC were so deficient that they failed to vindicate the applicant’s personal constitutional rights. The High Court of Ireland dismissed both arguments. |