The Convention on Cybercrime otherwise known as the Budapest Convention was a complex, pioneering instrument addressing cross-border computer crimes in the wake of the 21st century. As the first international treaty aiming to tackle new threats emerging from the cyberspace, the Convention signed in 2001 certainly influenced national regulators and law enforcement over many years. Two decades have passed since 2001 and the Internet era has undergone previously unpredictable changes, as web 2.0 services started to thrive. Even though the Convention can be considered a landmark in international legislation, after 20 years one must eventually assess how well it stood the test of time and whether it still has relevance. This article has no smaller goal but to evaluate the evolution of content-related cybercrimes and try to the question whether the Convention is still fit to tackle contemporary issues or rather, is outdated and ready to retire. |
Developments in International Law |
The Evolution of Content-Related Offences and Their Investigation During the First 20 Years of the Cybercrime Convention |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | cybercrime, content-related offence, cyberbullying, privacy, wiretapping |
Authors | Kinga Sorbán |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Case Notes |
The Afterlife of the Relocation of Judicial Cases |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | right to a lawful judge, National Judicial Council, relocation of judicial cases, reasonable time, length of proceedings |
Authors | Ágnes Czine |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal established by law is set out in Article 6(1) ECHR and Article XXVIII(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary. The elements of the definition of the right to a fair trial are closely tied to the requirement of judicial independence, impartiality and a court established by law. These guarantees’ purpose is to ensure that the applicant receive a judgment that is not prejudged by other branches of power, such as the influence of the executive, or the arbitrariness of the judiciary. This important human and fundamental rights requirement is monitored by bodies dedicated to the protection of democratic institutions. According to the laws of Hungary, lawsuits may be transferred to another court by the National Office for the Judiciary in order to reduce the workload. This solution has received strong international attention and scrutiny. Although these are actually not in force, they still have repercussions, which must be dealt with by the Constitutional Court. This article seeks to provide insight into the constitutional afterlife of this system of reallocation. |
Legal Documents |
An Integrated, Prosperous and Peaceful AfricaTransitional Justice Policy |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2019 |