Compared with other disciplines in the social sciences, conflict resolution is a relatively new, emerging professional and academic field. Many developments have shaped the current reality and boundaries of the field. This article is an attempt to provide a set of reflections on the major issues, challenges and possible future directions facing the field of conflict resolution. By narrating my own personal and professional journey, I hope to capture certain aspects and perspectives of this field. This is not a comprehensive review or ‘scientific’ charting of the field, nevertheless it attempts to shed light on areas and concepts that are otherwise taken for granted or neglected when the mapping of the field is done through more extensive empirical research. This mapping of conflict resolution after 30 years of practice, teaching and research first involves reflections on the conceptual or so-called theoretical groundings of the field. Second, it examines the various professional practices that have branched out through the last few decades. Third, it identifies some of the current limitations and challenges facing conflict resolution practitioners and scholars in their struggle to position the field in relation to current global realities. The final section discusses possible future directions to address existing gaps and refocus the research agenda of the field. |
Search result: 48 articles
Year 2013 xArticle |
Reflections on the Field of Conflict Resolution |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 2 2013 |
Keywords | peacebuilding field, culture and conflict resolution, power and conflict resolution, future trends in peacebuilding, critique of peacebuilding |
Authors | Mohammed Abu-Nimer |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
Sir William Dale Annual LectureThe Law Commission and the Implementation of Law Reform |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Authors | The Rt. Hon. Sir David Lloyd Jones |
Author's information |
Article |
Drafting of Legislation in Compliance with Model Laws |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | challenges, domestic legislation, model laws |
Authors | Lesedi Poloko |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Lawmaking is an essential attribute of a state. Laws differ from one country to another, and compliance with different legal rules may create problems. Uniformity of laws is an end in itself, and its value lies in its practical benefits. Interest in the quality of legislative instruments is a major concern, especially as regards the effectiveness of the national legislation. |
Article |
Drafting Conventions, Templates and Legislative Precedents, and their Effects on the Drafting Process and the Drafter |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | drafting conventions, templates, legislative precedents, drafter’s skill, necessary tools for effective communication of language of legislation |
Authors | Agnes Quartey Papafio |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The aim of this article is to explore whether drafting conventions, templates and legislative precedents contradict or complement the drafter’s style and if they complement the drafter’s style, the various ways in which the use of these tools achieves it. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | clan, rule of law, Albert Venn Dicey, Walter Scott, legal memory |
Authors | Dr. Mark S. Weiner |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In this essay, I provide a historical and theoretical framework for understanding the imaginative relation between the liberal rule of law and the kin-based form of socio-legal organization I call ‘the rule of the clan’ – a classic example of law created ‘from below’. Specifically, I believe that a culturalist disciplinary perspective reveals that the modern liberal state and its more centralized rule of law always stand in an ironic, dialectical relation to the rule of the clan as a legal form. Liberal society, that is, nurtures itself through an anti-liberal utopian imaginary. This article provides an intellectual history backdrop for theorizing that dialectical relationship by examining two contrasting ways in which nineteenth-century British intellectuals imagined the rule of law. Following the work of Charles Taylor and, more specifically in the legal field, Paul Kahn, my goal is to depict a social imaginary of modern liberalism that has been neglected within contemporary liberal theory – and, in doing so, provide a way to appreciate the cultural foundations of liberal legality. The article considers the stories that nineteenth-century British intellectuals told about the relation between the rule of law and the rule of the clan as a way to think about the rule of law today. It thus tacks between three different shores: the world of legal pluralism (the rule of the clan), the world of nineteenth-century British analysis of the rule of the clan and the contemporary relation between culture and modern liberal society. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | legal pluralism, rule of law promotion, legal reform, customary law, non-state legal systems, donor policy |
Authors | Dr.mr Ronald Janse |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Over the past 25 years, international organizations, NGOs and (mostly Western) states have spent considerable energy and resources on strengthening and reforming legal systems in developing countries. The results of these efforts have generally been disappointing, despite occasional successes. Among donors, one of most popular explanations of this failure in recent years is that rule of law promotion has wrongly focused almost exclusively on strengthening the formal legal system. Donors have therefore decided to 'engage' with informal justice systems. The turn to legal pluralism is to be welcomed for various reasons. But it is also surprising and worrisome. It is surprising because legal pluralism in developing countries was a fact of life before rule of law promotion began. What made donors pursuing legal reform blind to this reality for so long? It is worrisome because it is not self-evident that the factors which have contributed to such cognitive blindness have disappeared overnight. Are donors really ready to refocus their efforts on legal pluralism and 'engage' with informal justice systems? This paper, which is based on a review of the literature on donor engamenet with legal pluralism in so-called conflict affected and fragile states, is about these questions. It argues that 7 factors have been responsible for donor blindness regarding legal pluralism. It questions whether these factors have been addressed. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | Syria, personal status law, Eastern Catholic law, patriarchal family, marital obligations |
Authors | Esther Van Eijk Ph.D. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Family relations in Syria are governed by a plurality of personal status laws and courts. This plurality manifests itself on a variety of levels, including statutory, communal and individual. In this article, the author argues that, albeit this plurality, Syrian personal status law is also characterised by the prevalence of shared, gendered norms and views on marital life. Based on fieldwork conducted in a Catholic and a shar’iyya personal status courts in Damascus in 2009, the author examines the shared cultural understandings on marital relationships that were found in these courts, and as laid down – most importantly – in the respective Catholic and Muslim family laws. The article maintains that the patriarchal family model is preserved and reinforced by the various personal status laws and by the various actors which operated in the field of personal status law. Finally, two Catholic case studies are presented and analysed to demonstrate the importance and attachment to patriarchal gender norms in the Catholic first instance court of Damascus. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | national judges, legal pluralism, application of EU law, legal consciousness, supremacy and direct effect of EU law |
Authors | Urszula Jaremba Ph.D. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The notion and theory of legal pluralism have been witnessing an increasing interest on part of scholars. The theory that originates from the legal anthropological studies and is one of the major topical streams in the realm of socio-legal studies slowly but steady started to become a point of departure for other disciplines. Unavoidably it has also gained attention from the scholars in the realm of the law of the European Union. It is the aim of the present article to illustrate the legal reality in which the law of the Union and the national laws coexist and intertwine with each other and, subsequently, to provide some insight on the manner national judges personally construct their own understanding of this complex legal architecture and the problems they come across in that respect. In that sense, the present article not only illustrates the new, pluralistic legal environment that came into being with the founding of the Communities, later the European Union, but also adds another dimension to this by presenting selected, empirical data on how national judges in several Member States of the EU individually perceive, adapt to, experience and make sense of this reality of overlapping and intertwining legal orders. Thus, the principal aim of this article is to illustrate how the pluralistic legal system works in the mind of a national judge and to capture the more day-to-day legal reality by showing how the law works on the ground through the lived experiences of national judges. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Authors | Wibo van Rossum and Sanne Taekema |
Article |
Multilevel Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union and in Hungary |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Elisabeth Sándor-Szalay and Ágoston Mohay |
Author's information |
Article |
The Case of Franz Joseph and Lajos Kossuth before the English Court of ChanceryLegal Battle over the Ruins of a Repressed Revolution with Its Still Topical International Law Consequences |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Marcel Szabó |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | Family & Law, November 2013 |
Authors | Jacqueline Gray LL.M. and Pablo Quinzá Redondo LL.M. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article seeks to critically analyse the European Commission's Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (COM (2011) 126). It focuses upon the coordination of the Proposal's provisions on jurisdiction and applicable law with the parallel provisions contained in other related EU private international law instruments, namely those relating to divorce (Brussels II bis and Rome III) and succession (Succession Regulation). In doing so, the article adopts a 'stress-test' approach, presenting scenarios in which interaction between these related instruments takes place. The compositions and circumstances of the fictitious couples in these scenarios are varied in order to fully illustrate the potential consequences of the interplay between the instruments. This article seeks to assess the extent to which (in)consistency exists between the current and proposed EU private international instruments and, by evaluating this interaction through a number of norms, how identified inconsistencies impact upon international couples' legal relationships. In order to ensure the analysis remains as up to date as possible, the article will also take into account relevant changes introduced in the latest revised versions of the Proposal. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Authors | Antony Duff |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In this response to my five critics, I note the strength of the arguments in favour of treating the presumption of innocence as a narrow, legal presumption that operates only within the criminal process; but I then try to make clearer my reasons for talking of different presumptions of innocence (moral, rather than legal, presumptions) outside the criminal process, in other contexts in which issues of criminal guilt or innocence arise – presumptions that guide or are expressed in the conduct of the state’s officials towards its citizens, and of citizens towards each other. Once we look at these other contexts in which criminal guilt and innocence (of past and future crimes) are at stake, we can see the importance of civic trust as a practical attitude that citizens owe to each other; and the fruitfulness of examining the various normative roles that citizens may have to play in relation to the criminal law. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Authors | Anne Ruth Mackor and Vincent Geeraets |
AbstractAuthor's information |
|
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Keywords | pre-trial detention practice, presumption of guilt, incapacitation, presumption of innocence |
Authors | Lonneke Stevens |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The presumption of innocence (PoI) is considered to be an important principle for regulating pre-trial detention. The idea is that pre-trial detention should be a last resort. However, pre-trial detention practice demonstrates that pre-trial detention does not function on the basis of a presumption of innocence but rather from a presumption of guilt and dangerousness. It must be concluded that, with regard to pre-trial detention, the PoI has a rather limited normative effect. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Keywords | rules, principles, fairness, PoI |
Authors | Magnus Ulväng |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In my response to Duff I focus mainly on the following two issues. Firstly, I examine what kind of a norm the presumption of innocence (PoI) really is and how it ontologically differs from other types of rules, principles, rationales, etc. My tentative conclusion is that a PoI does not suffice the requirement of being a dogmatic rule and, thus, has less weight than what Duff perhaps assumes. |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2013 |
Authors | Antony Duff |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This paper explores the roles that the presumption of innocence (PoI) can play beyond the criminal trial, in other dealings that citizens may have with the criminal law and its officials. It grounds the PoI in a wider notion of the civic trust that citizens owe each other, and that the state owes its citizens: by attending to the roles that citizens may find themselves playing in relation to the criminal law (such roles as suspect, defendant, convicted offender and ‘ex-offender’), we can see both how a PoI protects us, beyond the confines of the trial, against various kinds of coercion, and how that PoI is modified or qualified as we acquire certain roles. To develop and illustrate this argument, I pay particular attention to the roles of defendant (both during the trial and while awaiting trial) and of ‘ex-offender,’ and to the duties that such roles bring with them. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2013 |
Keywords | banking sector, directors' duties, financial crisis, context-specific doctrines, public enforcement |
Authors | Wasima Khan LL.M. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The global financial crisis gives reason to revisit the debate on directors’ duties in corporate law, mainly with regard to the context of banks. This article explores the need, rationale and the potential for the introduction of context-specific directors’ duties and enforcement mechanisms in the banking sector in the Netherlands from a comparative perspective. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 2 2013 |
Keywords | Operationalizing sustainable development, human rights, individual rights/interests, collective rights/interests, human rights courts |
Authors | Emelie Folkesson MA |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article uses a generally accepted conceptualisation of sustainable development that can be operationalized in a judicial context. It focuses on the individual and collective dimensions of the environmental, economic and social pillars, as well as the consideration of inter-generational and intra-generational equity. Case law from the European, African and American systems is analysed to reveal if the elements of sustainable development have been incorporated in their jurisprudence. The analysis reveals that the human rights bodies have used different interpretative methods, some more progressive than others, in order to incorporate the elements of sustainable development in the scope of their mandate, even if they do not mention the concept as such. The overall conclusion is that sustainable development has been operationalized through human rights courts to a certain extent. Sometimes, however, a purely individualised approach to human rights creates a hurdle to further advance sustainable development. The conclusion creates the impression that sustainable development is not just a concept on paper, but that it in fact can be operationalized, also in other courts and quasi-courts. Moreover, it shows that the institutional structure of human rights courts has been used in other areas than pure human rights protection, which means that other areas of law might make use of it to fill the gap of a non-existing court structure. |