Africa’s contribution towards the development of the International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Articles should not be assessed exclusively on the basis of the limited engagement of African States or individuals in the discursive processes within the ILC, but from a historical perspective. When analysed from that perspective, it becomes clear that Africa has had a long connection to atrocity crimes due to the mass victimization of its civilian populations during the colonial and postcolonial periods and apartheid in South Africa. Following independence in the 1960s, African States played a leading role in the elaboration of legal regimes to deal with international crimes such as apartheid, or in the development of accountability mechanisms to respond to such crimes. Although some of these efforts proved unsuccessful in the end, the normative consensus that was generated went a long way in laying the foundations for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which, in turn, influenced the conceptual framework of the ILC Draft Articles. This article proposes that given this historical nexus, the substantive provisions and international cooperation framework provided for in the future crimes against humanity convention, Africa has more reasons to support than to oppose it when negotiations begin at the United Nations General Assembly or an international diplomatic conference. |
Article |
The ILC Draft Articles on Crimes Against HumanityAn African Perspective |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Africa, norm creation, crimes against humanity, colonial crimes, official immunity |
Authors | Alhagi B.M. Marong |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
Time to DeliverDefining a Process Towards the Negotiation of a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Sixth Committee, International Law Commission, intergovernmental negotiations, multilateral treaties, treaty-making process |
Authors | Pablo Arrocha Olabuenaga |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In 2019, the International Law Commission (ILC) adopted its articles on the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity and referred them to the UN General Assembly with the recommendation of adopting a multilateral treaty based on them. The General Assembly’s Sixth Committee was unable to take a decision on this matter and deferred its consideration to 2020. This article focuses on how, in resuming its discussion, the Sixth Committee will have a unique opportunity to define the process towards intergovernmental negotiations. This will close a gap in international criminal law, while generating a new dynamic in its relationship with the ILC on codification, breaking its current cyclical inertia of inaction. |
Article |
Relating to ‘The Other’The ILC Draft Convention on Crimes Against Humanity and the Mutual Legal Assistance Initiative |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | International Law Commission (ILC), Draft Convention on Crimes Against Humanity, Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) initiative, crimes against humanity, international criminal law |
Authors | Larissa van den Herik |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Convention on Crimes Against Humanity and the Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) Initiative have largely run in tandem throughout their development. Both projects are motivated by similar gap-filling desires and both projects aim to expand the international criminal justice toolkit; however, these similarities have led to questions if both projects are necessary. This article addresses that question, looking at how different actors have answered this question during the respective processes of maturation of both projects and where both projects stand today. It argues that, while there is significant overlap between the projects, both instruments have merits which the other is lacking, and the optimal solution would be to bring both projects to fruition. |
Article |
Unlocking the Sixth Committee’s Potential to Act for Crimes Against Humanity as It Did for Genocide |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | crimes against humanity, General Assembly, International Law Commission, Sixth Committee, United Nations |
Authors | Michael Imran Kanu |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The International Law Commission, on completion of its work on the draft articles on prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity, recommended to the General Assembly the elaboration of a convention by the said Assembly or by an international conference of plenipotentiaries based on the said draft articles. The Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly at the first opportunity only took note of the draft articles and postponed consideration of the recommendation to its next session. The resolution of the General Assembly, as recommended by the Sixth Committee, does not readily disclose the full extent of the debate, proposals and concerns expressed in the Sixth Committee that prevented the General Assembly from acting on the Commission’s recommendation. This article, in considering the cornucopia of views expressed by States, outlines a path to unlock the Sixth Committee’s potential to act, by proposing a separation of the organizational and substantive matters and future-proofing the further consideration of elaborating a convention through the adoption of a structured approach. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Authors | Sean D. Murphy |
Author's information |
Article |
Asian Perspectives on the International Law Commission’s Work on Crimes Against Humanity |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | Asian States, crimes against humanity, international criminal law, Draft Articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity |
Authors | Mari Takeuchi |
AbstractAuthor's information |
No Asian States expressed regret over the failure of the Sixth Committee to reach a consensus on the elaboration of a convention on crimes against humanity. This article examines the comments of Asian States during the Sixth Committee debate on the final Draft Articles submitted by the International Law Commission, demonstrating that most States believed further discussions were needed. It situates these comments against the wider Asian approach to international criminal law, and argues that the concerns of the Asian States during the Sixth Committee are part of a broader context. In doing so, it suggests a common ground for future discussion and the progression of a convention. |
Article |
ILC Report on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity and Enforced Disappearance |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | enforced disappearance, without prejudice clause, Draft Articles, crimes against humanity, commentaries |
Authors | Claudio Grossman |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article values as an important milestone the Draft Articles on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity. They greatly contribute to the development of international law, inter alia, seeking to prevent impunity and to establish the duty to prosecute or extradite those who have allegedly committed crimes against humanity. They are a solid basis for a possible diplomatic conference designed to adopt a convention that will establish binding obligations for all ratifying States. The Draft Articles took as a point of departure the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court to list and define crimes against humanity, and, considering current developments in international law, departed from the Rome Statute so far in two matters: the definition of gender and the treatment of persecution. This article argues why it is essential to follow a similar approach and adopt the definition of enforced disappearance currently used in international conventions that deal with such a horrendous crime. The article also shows why the ‘without prejudice’ clause currently proposed by the Draft Articles is unsatisfactory, depriving States that do not follow the restrictive definition incorporated more than two decades ago in the Rome Statute from the benefits of the proposed convention. |
Article |
|
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Authors | Charles C. Jalloh and Leila N. Sadat |
Author's information |
Article |
An Analysis of State Reactions to the ILC’s Work on Crimes Against HumanityA Pattern of Growing Support |
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | crimes against humanity, Sixth Committee, International Law Commission, Draft Articles, International Criminal Court |
Authors | Leila N. Sadat and Madaline George |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The international community has been engaged with the topic of crimes against humanity since the International Law Commission (ILC) began work on it in 2013, with a view to draft articles for a future convention. Between 2013 and 2019, 86 States as well as several entities and subregional groups made comments on the ILC’s work at the United Nations Sixth Committee or through written comments to the ILC. This article is the culmination of the Whitney R. Harris World Law Institute’s work cataloguing and analysing States’ comments by assigning each statement to one of five categories – strong positive, positive, neutral, negative, and strong negative – examining both specific words and the general tenor of the comments. This article analyses the development of States’ reactions to the ILC’s work over time, as well as specific issues that frequently arose, observing that there is a pattern of growing support from States to use the ILC’s Draft Articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity as the basis for a new convention. |
Article |
|
Journal | African Journal of International Criminal Justice, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | African Union (AU), United Nations Security Council (UNSC), International Criminal Court (ICC), immunity, impunity |
Authors | Fabrice Tambe Endoh |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The African Union (AU) claims that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is selective against African leaders. The issue therefore arises concerning the validity of the allegations of selectivity. Partly because of such concerns, African Heads of States adopted the Malabo Protocol during their annual summit held in June 2014. Article 46A bis of the Protocol provides immunity for sitting Heads of States. This provision contradicts Article 27 of the Rome Statute and, consequently, arguably reverses the progress made so far in international criminal law by giving priority to immunity in the face of impunity. This article considers the validity of some of the allegations of selective application of criminal sanctions by the ICC and the likely consequence of the Malabo Protocol for regional and international criminal justice. The article argues that the Malabo Protocol should not be ratified by African states until the shield of immunity granted to sitting Heads of States is lifted to better advance the interests of justice for the victims of international crimes in Africa. In addition, the complementarity clause stated in the Malabo Protocol should have a nexus with the ICC such that the Court would be allowed to prosecute the perpetrators of international crimes in circumstances where the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJHR) prove reluctant to do so. |