Alternative Dispute Resolution (=ADR) is a generic reference to consensus-based processes that provide an alternative to litigation and to binding arbitration procedures. Analysing European provisions, the European legislator pushes Alternative Dispute Resolution methods as a means of resolving not only consumer-to-business disputes but also business-to-business. This may determine over the long term a sort of ‘dejurisdictionalization’ process, moving disputes from tribunals to Alternative Dispute Resolution methods. Procedural rights, however, such as raising interpretative questions to the European Court of Justice, may only be exercised before a court. |
Article |
|
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 2 2020 |
Keywords | European legislation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, civil procedure |
Authors | Rebecca Berto |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
The Online Civil Money ClaimLitigation, ADR and ODR in One Single Dispute Resolution Process |
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | ADR, pre-action protocols, civil procedure, online dispute resolution, mediation, civil justice, online civil money claim, online services |
Authors | Md Mahar Abbasy |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article considers the recent reforms in English Civil Justice System, especially the new Online Civil Money Claim (OCMC). To make the UK courts easily accessible and affordable, Lord Justice Briggs in his Civil Courts Structure Review recommended for the introduction of an Online Solutions Court. This is a revolutionary step because it embeds alternative dispute resolution (ADR), in particular mediation, into the court system. This is very important because mediation emerged as an alternative to courts but has become an integral part of it. This study critically examines how mediation is being embedded into the English Civil Justice System and argues for a balanced relationship between litigation and mediation because they complement each other. This article is divided into four sections (a) Section 2 will discuss how the Online Court will impact the open justice; (b) Section 3 will provide an overview of the three stages of OCMC; (c) Section 4 will carry out a critical analysis of the OCMC; and (d) Section 5 will seek to put forward solutions and recommendations in light of the findings. |