The role of shame in restorative justice has a long pedigree. Most often shame has been conceptualised in terms of the act of the offender. The focus of this paper is instead on the shame of the person experiencing wrongdoing: a victim who is neither guilty nor responsible for the experience. This has the advantage of making more clear that shame fundamentally concerns an experience of ‘who I am’ rather than ‘what I have done’, while the reaction to the experience of shame in victimization should involve attention to the identity-related questions that are posed by this experience. This way of viewing shame is connected to the distinction between countering injustice and doing justice, and offers a number of fresh insights into victimological phenomena in restorative justice and restorative justice more generally. |
Article |
The shame of injustice: the ethics of victimology and what it means for restorative justice |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 3 2019 |
Keywords | Victimology, restorative justice, shame, Bernard Williams, Susan Brison |
Authors | Antony Pemberton |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
Looking beneath the iceberg: can shame and pride be handled restoratively in cases of workplace bullying |
Journal | The International Journal of Restorative Justice, Issue 2 2019 |
Keywords | Bullying, victimisation, shame management, pride management, social connectedness |
Authors | Valerie Braithwaite and Eliza Ahmed |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Central to restorative justice interventions that follow revised reintegrative shaming theory (Ahmed, Harris, Braithwaite & Braithwaite, 2001) is individual capacity to manage shame and pride in safe and supportive spaces. From a random sample of 1,967 Australians who responded to a national crime survey, 1,045 completed a module about bullying experiences at work over the past year, along with measures of shame and pride management (the MOSS-SASD and MOPS scales). Those who identified themselves as having bullied others were pride-focused, not shame-focused. They were more likely to express narcissistic pride over their work success, lauding their feats over others, and were less likely to express humble pride, sharing their success with others. In contrast, victims were defined by acknowledged and displaced shame over work task failures. In addition to these personal impediments to social reintegration, those who bullied and those targeted had low trust in others, particularly professionals. While these findings do not challenge macro interventions for culture change through more respectful and restorative practices, they provide a basis for setting boundaries for the appropriate use of restorative justice meetings to address particular workplace bullying complaints. |