This comparative study looks into the proposed “vaccine passport” initiative from various human rights aspects. It was undertaken by the Global Digital Human Rights Network, an action started under the EU’s Cooperation in Science and Technology programme. The network currently unites more than 80 scholars and practitioners from 40 countries. The findings are based on responses to questions put to the network members by the authors of this study in February 2021. |
Search result: 36 articles
The search results will be filtered on:Journal East European Yearbook on Human Rights x
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | Covid-19, vaccine passport |
Authors | Mart Susi and Tiina Pajuste |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | non-coherence theory of digital human rights, network approach, universality of human rights, transversality effect |
Authors | Mart Susi |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The idea of universality of human rights is under multidimensional challenges entailing the aspects of practice generalization and postmodern social theories with juridical ambitions. Competing theories continue to exist and the elements of choice between theories are determined by practice, convenience and economies and not necessarily by idealistic goals. Among the many arguments raised against the universality of human rights stands the network approach, which is characterized by permeability, its supportive purpose of vertical normative structures, its impact on the rise of social responsibility, obscuring effect on legitimacy and “reliance on trust”. Supportive purpose of vertical normative structures in a network means that private networks can articulate the claim for correctness in self-regulation due to the existence of the vertical normative backbone. One of the main reservations related to digital human rights law and remedies through the network approach is that of distortion of legitimacy. The article approaches these issues through a novel theoretical approach of non-coherence. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Authors | Matthias C. Kettemann and Martin Fertmann |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This study explores the spread of disinformation relating to the Covid-19 pandemic on the internet, dubbed by some as the pandemic’s accompanying “infodemic”, and the societal reactions to this development across different countries and platforms. The study’s focus is on the role of states and platforms in combatting online disinformation. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Authors | Martin Fertmann and Matthias C. Kettemann |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Terms-of-service based actions against political and state actors as both key subjects and objects of political opinion formation have become a focal point of the ongoing debates over who should set and enforce the rules for speech on online platforms. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | artificial intelligence, chatbots, CRM, data protection, privacy |
Authors | Konstantinos Kouroupis, Dimitrios Vagianos and Aikaterini Totka |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In the new digital era as it is formed by the European digital strategy, the explosion of e-commerce and related technologies has led to the formation of tremendous volumes of customer data that could be exploited in a variety of ways. Customer relationship management (CRM) systems can now exploit these data sets to map consumers’ behaviour more effectively. As social media and artificial intelligence widened their penetration, firms’ interest shifted to chatbots in order to serve their customers’ needs. Nowadays, CRM and bots are developed in a parallel way. With the help of these virtual personal assistants, CRM establishes a virtual relationship with consumers. However, the extended collection and use of personal data under this scope may give rise to ethical and legal issues. In this article, the term CRM is defined, followed by an analysis of the way chatbots support CRM systems. In the second part, the legal context of chatbot use will be highlighted in an attempt to investigate whether there are personal data protection issues and whether certain rights or ethical rules are somehow violated. The draft AI Regulation, in combination with the provisions of GDPR and e-Privacy Directive, offers a significant background for our study. The article concludes by demonstrating the use of chatbots as an inherent part of the new digital era and lays special emphasis on the term ‘transparency’, which seems to penetrate the lawfulness of their use and guarantee our privacy. |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2021 |
Keywords | judicial independence, selection of judges, appointment of judges, rule of law, mutual trust |
Authors | Vygantė Milašiūtė and Skirgailė Žalimienė |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The article examines the procedure for selection and appointment of judges in Lithuania in the light of the European standards of judicial independence. Both the Council of Europe and the European Union (EU) legal materials are relied on. The procedural role of different actors, the criteria for assessment of candidates, the question of judicial review of selection and appointment decisions as well as the problem of delays of judicial appointments are also examined. Even though the Lithuanian system for the selection and appointment of judges has been assessed favourably by European institutions, certain elements of the system are questionable. However, as long as these deficiencies are not systemic and do not raise issues of the rule of law in the sense of EU law, they would not negatively affect the operation of the EU law-based mutual trust instruments with respect to Lithuania. A suggestion is made that paying more attention to non-systemic deficiencies of judicial independence and the rule of law in EU member states could be beneficial for improving the protection of individual rights. |
Human Rights Practice Review |
The Czech Republic |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Viktor Kundrák and Maroš Matiaško |
Author's information |
Human Rights Practice Review |
Kosovo |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Sabiha Shala |
Author's information |
Article |
Beizaras and Levickas v. LithuaniaRecognizing Individual Harm Caused by Cyber Hate? |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | hate speech, verbal hate crime, cyber hate, effective investigation, homophobia |
Authors | Viktor Kundrák |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The issue of online hatred or cyber hate is at the heart of heated debates over possible limitations of online discussions, namely in the context of social media. There is freedom of expression and the value of the internet in and of itself on the one hand, and the need to protect the rights of victims, to address intolerance and racism, as well as the overarching values of equality of all in dignity and rights, on the other. Criminalizing some (forms of) expressions seems to be problematic but, many would agree, under certain circumstances, a necessary or even unavoidable solution. However, while the Court has long ago declared as unacceptable bias-motivated violence and direct threats, which under Articles 2, 3 and 8 in combination with Article 14 of the ECHR, activate the positive obligation of states to effectively investigate hate crimes, the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania presented the first opportunity for the Court to extend such an obligation to the phenomenon of online verbal hate crime. This article will first address the concepts of hate speech and hate crime, including their intersection and, through the lens of pre-existing case law, identify the key messages for both national courts and practitioners. On the margins, the author will also discuss the issue of harm caused by verbal hate crime and the need to understand and recognize its gravity. |
Human Rights Practice Review |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Enis Omerović and Lejla Zilić |
Author's information |
Article |
The Question of JurisdictionThe Impact of Ultra Vires Decisions on the ECJ’s Normative Power and Potential Effects for the Field of Data Protection |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | ECJ, German Constitutional Court, principle of proportionality, primacy of EU law, data protection, principle of conferral, ultra vires judgments |
Authors | Carsten M. Wulff |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The ultra vires judgment of the German Constitutional Court on the debt security purchasing of the ECB system sent shockwaves throughout Europe. Some scholars see the legal framework, specifically the principle of the supremacy of the European Union in danger. This article argues that the judgment is a challenge for Luxembourg; however, there have been warning signs from the Czech Republic and Denmark that constitutional courts will not shy away from criticizing, when the ECJ oversteps its jurisdiction. The author argues that the judgment may weaken the overall normative power of the court and will assess whether a similar judgment could occur in the field of data protection and national security exceptions. The only way back to normality will be for the court to ensure it does not overstep its jurisdiction and the European Institutions unconditionally backing the ECJ in the expected upcoming conflict with the constitutional courts of Member States. |
Human Rights Practice Review |
Poland |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | Vita Czepek and Jakub Czepek |
Author's information |
Human Rights Literature Review |
Belarus |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Authors | E. Konnova and P. Marshyn |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2020 |
Keywords | human rights, emergency situation, COVID-19 and sanitary crisis, Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights (the ECtHR), Estonia |
Authors | Maris Kuurberg |
AbstractAuthor's information |
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Estonia was one of the states that decided to inform the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of the health-related emergency situation in Estonia and noted, with reference to Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that some emergency measures may involve a derogation from certain obligations under the Convention. The Government’s considerations proceeded from the unprecedented scale of the sanitary crisis and the scope of extraordinary measures taken to tackle it. Importance was attached to the fact that the Court has never before assessed health-related exceptions allowed in some of the articles of the Convention in a situation which affects the whole nation – not to mention the articles of the Convention which do not set out any exceptions at all. Article 15 of the Convention, on the other hand, is designed to be applicable in public emergency situations threatening the life of the nation. |
Human Rights Literature Reviews |
Hungary |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Alexandra Sipos PhD |
Author's information |
Article |
The Smuggling of Migrants across the Mediterranean SeaA Human Rights Perspective |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | smuggling, refugees, migration, readmission, interceptions |
Authors | J. Shadi Elserafy LL.M., |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Irregular migration by sea is one of the most apparent contemporary political issues, and one that entails many legal challenges. Human smuggling by sea is only one aspect of irregular migration that represents a particular challenge for States, as sovereignty and security interests clash with the principles and obligations of human rights and refugee law. In dealing with the problem of migrant smuggling by sea, States have conflicting roles, including the protection of national borders, suppressing the smuggling of migrants, rescuing migrants and guarding human rights. |
Article |
The Right of Appeal against a Decision on Disciplinary Liability of a Judge |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Keywords | disciplinary proceedings, scope of judicial review, standard of judicial review, remedial measures |
Authors | Taras Pashuk PhD |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article deals with the questions of scope and the standard of judicial review of a disciplinary decision against a judge. It further addresses the issue of remedial powers, which should be granted to the reviewing authority in this type of cases. It is suggested that the scope of judicial review of a disciplinary decision against a judge should extend to questions of law, fact and discretion. What actually varies is the depth of review or, more precisely, the standards of review and the corresponding level of deference, which must be demonstrated to the primary decision-making authority. It is further suggested that there are several factors that have influence on the formation of the standards of review: the institutional, procedural and expertise factors. As to the remedial capacity, the reviewing court should be provided with the competence to apply adequate remedial measures. The reviewing court should be able to effectively eliminate the identified shortcomings in the proceedings before the first-instance authority. For the effective protection of the rights at issue, it may be important for the reviewing court not only to repeal the decision subject to review, but also take other remedial measures. The legitimacy and necessity for applying particular remedial action should be established by taking into account the same institutional, procedural and expertise factors. |
Human Rights Practice Reviews |
Ukraine |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Dr. Tetyana Antsupova |
Author's information |
Human Rights Practice Reviews |
The Russian Federation |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Igor Bartsits, Oleg Zaytsev and Kira Sazonova PhD |
Author's information |
Human Rights Literature Reviews |
Estonia |
Journal | East European Yearbook on Human Rights, Issue 1 2019 |
Authors | Ingrid Kauler LLM |
Author's information |