The field of conflict resolution has developed enough to become diverse and rich with perspectives, yet the common ground between those perspectives – a permanent core essence – has not yet been defined. The use of identity theory, specifically intergroup identity theory, may be the most effective method to understand the field’s foundations. In this article, six possible group identity claims – or grand narratives – are offered. Together, they may form a foundational code for the field, which may be examined and proved in context. Defining the profession of conflict resolution also requires engagement and dialogue with other related professions. In addition to mapping the six grand narratives, this article will suggest how these narratives can at times generate differences with other academic disciplines that deal with conflicts. |
Search result: 84 articles
Year 2013 xArticle |
Experimenting with Conflicts ConstructivelyIn Search of Identity for the Field of Conflict Resolution |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 2 2013 |
Keywords | conflict resolution, identity, group identity, constructive engagement, narratives |
Authors | Michal Alberstein |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
PracademicsMaking Negotiation Theory Implemented, Interdisciplinary, and International |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 2 2013 |
Authors | Andrea Kupfer Schneider |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Negotiation can be thought of as the tool that facilitates conflict engagement and resolution. As part of, and yet different from, conflict theory, negotiation theory has had a separate parallel development in the last 30 years. The challenges for negotiation theory in the future are similar to those found in the broader conflict theory – ensuring that negotiation theory can be implemented by practitioners; making sure that negotiation theory draws upon a multitude of disciplines; and includes theories, experiences and culture from around the world. The development of negotiation theories in law schools – where communication to resolve disputes is part of the job description – highlights the importance of pracademics and demonstrates how we need effective theories to engage in conflict. |
Miscellaneous |
|
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 2 2013 |
Abstract |
Bernie Mayer is a central figure in conflict engagement. He is a founding partner at one of the pioneering firms in the field, CDR Associates, which became internationally recognized for work in a wide array of conflicts – interpersonal, family, workplace, environmental, governmental and international. A leading practitioner and scholar in the field, Mayer is a prolific author, and teaches at the Werner Institute for Negotiation and Dispute Resolution at Creighton University and Kroc Institute of International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame. He has worked across the globe as a mediator, facilitator, teacher, trainer, dispute systems designer and programme administrator. |
Article |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 4 2013 |
Authors | Martijn Scheltema |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 4 2013 |
Authors | John G. Ruggie |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Environmental Due Diligence, Environmental CSR, Business enterprises and the environment, Environmental complement to Ruggie Framework |
Authors | Katinka D. Jesse and Erik V. Koppe |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In 2011, following his 2005 initial mandate of the UN Commission on Human Rights and his extended 2008 mandate of the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on the issues of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Professor John Ruggie, issued the final text of the ‘Guiding Principles for the Implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework”‘. The 2008 Framework on Business and Human Rights and the complementing 2011 Guiding Principles consist of three pillars: the duty of states to protect human rights, the responsibility of business enterprises to respect human rights, and access to remedies for victims of human rights abuses. They currently qualify as the dominant paradigm in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse, also because they now form part of various soft law and self-regulation initiatives. The Framework and Guiding Principles do not, however, specifically focus on environmental issues, but their systematic approach and structure do provide a model to address state duties and business responsibilities to care of the environment. This article is intended to complement the UN Framework and Guiding Principles on business and human rights with principles in the field of business and the environment. Hence, it is submitted that states have a customary duty to care for the environment; it is similarly submitted that business enterprises have a responsibility to care for the environment; and it is submitted that stakeholders must have access to remedies in relation to breaches of these duties and responsibilities. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 4 2013 |
Authors | Jan Eijsbouts |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | CSR, human rights, grievance mechanism, interest-based approach, rights-based approach |
Authors | Cristina Cedillo |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The Special Representative to the UN Secretary-General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, establishes access to remedy as one of the three pillars of the UN ‘Protect, Respect, Remedy’ Framework. In this Framework, Ruggie prescribes that company-based grievance mechanisms can be one effective means of enabling remediation to those potentially being impacted by business enterprises’ activities. This report proposes a model for company-based grievance mechanisms that follow a combination of interest-based and rights-compatible approaches to conflict resolution of all corporate social responsibility issues in company–stakeholder relationships. |
Article |
Sir William Dale Annual LectureThe Law Commission and the Implementation of Law Reform |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Authors | The Rt. Hon. Sir David Lloyd Jones |
Author's information |
Article |
Drafting of Legislation in Compliance with Model Laws |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | challenges, domestic legislation, model laws |
Authors | Lesedi Poloko |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Lawmaking is an essential attribute of a state. Laws differ from one country to another, and compliance with different legal rules may create problems. Uniformity of laws is an end in itself, and its value lies in its practical benefits. Interest in the quality of legislative instruments is a major concern, especially as regards the effectiveness of the national legislation. |
Article |
Linguistic Disharmony, National Language Authority and Legislative Drafting in Islamic Republic of Pakistan |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | National Language Authority, National Language of Pakistan, Legislation in Urdu, Plain Language Movement, Urdu Language |
Authors | Mazhar Ilahi |
AbstractAuthor's information |
It is quite interesting to note that first, the first language of most of the population of Pakistan remains different in different geographical regions. Secondly, Urdu, which is the second language of most of the population of Pakistan though declared to be the sole constitutional and official language, is not so accepted by all the communities resident in Pakistan. As a result, and thirdly, the laws of Pakistan are drafted in a non-native language, English, which is mostly the third language of a small fraction of the country’s population . This situation runs counter to the theme of the Plain Language Movement for writing of laws (PLM), which strives to make the laws understandable for its subjects. The problem, in reality, owes its genesis to different ethno-lingual and political issues. However, without going into much detail of these ethno-lingual and political elements, this article aims to analyse the question of the need for linguistic harmony, the main causes of lack of focus upon the same and the role of the National Language Authority (NLA) in the context. In addressing these issues the author concludes that lack of political will to handle the natural ensuing issues of the multilingual features of the Pakistani society and the (English) linguistic hegemony of the ruling elites (civil and military bureaucracy) are the two main causes of the failure of the NLA to administer Urdu as a sole national/official/legislative language of Pakistan. |
Article |
Drafting Conventions, Templates and Legislative Precedents, and their Effects on the Drafting Process and the Drafter |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 4 2013 |
Keywords | drafting conventions, templates, legislative precedents, drafter’s skill, necessary tools for effective communication of language of legislation |
Authors | Agnes Quartey Papafio |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The aim of this article is to explore whether drafting conventions, templates and legislative precedents contradict or complement the drafter’s style and if they complement the drafter’s style, the various ways in which the use of these tools achieves it. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | legal pluralism, rule of law promotion, legal reform, customary law, non-state legal systems, donor policy |
Authors | Dr.mr Ronald Janse |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Over the past 25 years, international organizations, NGOs and (mostly Western) states have spent considerable energy and resources on strengthening and reforming legal systems in developing countries. The results of these efforts have generally been disappointing, despite occasional successes. Among donors, one of most popular explanations of this failure in recent years is that rule of law promotion has wrongly focused almost exclusively on strengthening the formal legal system. Donors have therefore decided to 'engage' with informal justice systems. The turn to legal pluralism is to be welcomed for various reasons. But it is also surprising and worrisome. It is surprising because legal pluralism in developing countries was a fact of life before rule of law promotion began. What made donors pursuing legal reform blind to this reality for so long? It is worrisome because it is not self-evident that the factors which have contributed to such cognitive blindness have disappeared overnight. Are donors really ready to refocus their efforts on legal pluralism and 'engage' with informal justice systems? This paper, which is based on a review of the literature on donor engamenet with legal pluralism in so-called conflict affected and fragile states, is about these questions. It argues that 7 factors have been responsible for donor blindness regarding legal pluralism. It questions whether these factors have been addressed. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | Syria, personal status law, Eastern Catholic law, patriarchal family, marital obligations |
Authors | Esther Van Eijk Ph.D. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Family relations in Syria are governed by a plurality of personal status laws and courts. This plurality manifests itself on a variety of levels, including statutory, communal and individual. In this article, the author argues that, albeit this plurality, Syrian personal status law is also characterised by the prevalence of shared, gendered norms and views on marital life. Based on fieldwork conducted in a Catholic and a shar’iyya personal status courts in Damascus in 2009, the author examines the shared cultural understandings on marital relationships that were found in these courts, and as laid down – most importantly – in the respective Catholic and Muslim family laws. The article maintains that the patriarchal family model is preserved and reinforced by the various personal status laws and by the various actors which operated in the field of personal status law. Finally, two Catholic case studies are presented and analysed to demonstrate the importance and attachment to patriarchal gender norms in the Catholic first instance court of Damascus. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Keywords | national judges, legal pluralism, application of EU law, legal consciousness, supremacy and direct effect of EU law |
Authors | Urszula Jaremba Ph.D. |
AbstractAuthor's information |
The notion and theory of legal pluralism have been witnessing an increasing interest on part of scholars. The theory that originates from the legal anthropological studies and is one of the major topical streams in the realm of socio-legal studies slowly but steady started to become a point of departure for other disciplines. Unavoidably it has also gained attention from the scholars in the realm of the law of the European Union. It is the aim of the present article to illustrate the legal reality in which the law of the Union and the national laws coexist and intertwine with each other and, subsequently, to provide some insight on the manner national judges personally construct their own understanding of this complex legal architecture and the problems they come across in that respect. In that sense, the present article not only illustrates the new, pluralistic legal environment that came into being with the founding of the Communities, later the European Union, but also adds another dimension to this by presenting selected, empirical data on how national judges in several Member States of the EU individually perceive, adapt to, experience and make sense of this reality of overlapping and intertwining legal orders. Thus, the principal aim of this article is to illustrate how the pluralistic legal system works in the mind of a national judge and to capture the more day-to-day legal reality by showing how the law works on the ground through the lived experiences of national judges. |
Editorial |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 3/4 2013 |
Authors | Wibo van Rossum and Sanne Taekema |
Article |
Social Europe after Lisbon: Putting the ‘Social’ into the ‘Market Economy’ |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Catherine Barnard |
Author's information |
Article |
Regulating Local Border Traffic in the European UnionSalient Features of Intersecting Legal Orders (EU Law, International Law, Hungarian Law) in the Shomodi Case (C-254/11) |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Tamás Molnár |
Author's information |
Article |
Old-Age Discrimination: The Age-Blindness of International Human Rights Law |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Adrienne Komanovics |
Author's information |
Book Review |
A Whole Image or a Few Pieces of Mosaic?A Comment on the Monograph of Miklós Király: Unity and Diversity – The Cultural Effects of the Law of the European Union |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2013 |
Authors | Bartha Ildikó |
Author's information |