There is a close link between the growth of Internet usage, the development of mobile technology, the expansion of markets and the increasing number of online dispute resolution mechanisms (ODRs). This article seeks to start a conversation about the need to provide justice by means of effective mechanisms, in particular for e-commerce disputes and transnational litigation. It also provides some information on the recent international initiatives towards the regulation of this new arena, and concludes with an early approach to the future challenges and the impact on training, qualifications and expertise of ODR professionals and service providers. |
Search result: 25 articles
Year 2015 xArticle |
E-Commerce, ICTs and Online Dispute Resolution: Is This the Beginning of a New Professional Profile? |
Journal | International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Issue 2 2015 |
Keywords | Mobile phones, ADR, ODR, mediation, conflict resolution |
Authors | Aura Esther Vilalta and Rosa Pérez Martell |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Article |
Sir William Dale Annual Memorial LectureIs Legislation Literature? |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 3 2015 |
Authors | Sir Geoffrey Bowman |
Author's information |
Article |
Delegated Legislation in Nigeria: The Challenges of Control |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 3 2015 |
Keywords | delegated legislation, parliament, control, quality, parliamentary scrutiny |
Authors | Jemina Benson LL.M |
AbstractAuthor's information |
In considering how society generally is regulated, most times focus is always on Acts of parliament that are passed by the legislative arm of government. However, delegated legislation is another aspect of law making that is of immense importance for the regulation of any given society. This form of lawmaking being a deviation from the norm has some challenges in terms of control. This article seeks to examine some of these challenges emphasising that adequate parliamentary scrutiny will prevent the harbouring of bad-quality legislation. |
Statutory interpretation is quickly becoming the primary function of our courts. Ambiguity, unexpected scenarios, and drafting errors in legislation compound this challenging task, obliging many judges to turn to debate transcripts and other legislative materials in search of our elected representatives’ intent. |
Article |
|
Journal | Erasmus Law Review, Issue 4 2015 |
Keywords | civil procedure, United States, small and simple matters |
Authors | Manuel Gomez and Juan Carlos Gomez |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article, which is based on the research conducted for the General Report ‘Relief in Small and Simple Matters in an Age of Austerity’ presented at the XV World Congress of Procedural Law, provides a contextualised and broad overview of these phenomena in the United States. After describing the general features of the federal and state judiciaries, including its adversarial model of judging, and the importance of the jury system, the article turns its attention to discuss the factors that affect the cost of litigation in the United States, the different models of litigation funding, the available legal aid mechanisms, and the procedural tools available for handling small and simple disputes. Furthermore, this article briefly revisits the discussion about the effect of austerity on the functioning of the United States legal system on the handling of small and simple matters and ends with a brief conclusion that summarises its contribution and sketches the points for future research on this important topic. |
Article |
The Practical Application of Restraining Orders |
Journal | Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Issue 1 2015 |
Authors | Erzsébet Tamási and Orsolya Bolyky |
Author's information |
Article |
International Programs and Initiatives on Space for Disaster Management |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 10 2015 |
Authors | Shripad Jagdale |
Author's information |
Article |
Disaster Management Law in the Space Age |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 10 2015 |
Authors | Paul B. Larsen |
Author's information |
Article |
|
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 8 2015 |
Authors | P.J. Blount and Rafael Moro-Aguilar |
Article |
Internet from the SkyLegal Challenges |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 7 2015 |
Authors | Dimitrios Stratigentas and Mclee Kerolle |
Author's information |
Article |
Assistance by the Launching AuthorityRequirement or Entitlement? |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 7 2015 |
Authors | Hannes Mayer |
Author's information |
Article |
Legal Motherhood and Parental ResponsibilityA Comparative Study on the Tensions between Scientific Knowledge, Social Reality and Personal Identity |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 2 2015 |
Keywords | motherhood, child’s right to identity, baby-box, secret birth, confidential birth |
Authors | Prof. dr. Christine Budzikiewicz and Dr. Machteld Vonk |
AbstractAuthor's information |
For the past 15 to 20 years there has been intense discussion in many European countries how mothers in a crisis situation can be prevented from abandoning or even killing their new born babies. Baby-boxes have been installed in a number of countries and/or possibilities for anonymous birth have been discussed or introduced. The Committee on the Rights of the Child expressed concern over these developments and stated that both developments infringe on the child’s right to know its origins. Both Germany and the Netherlands have taken steps to protect new mothers and their babies in crisis situations by introducing a form of secrecy surrounding the mother’s identity. In Germany this has taken the form of a recently introduced law that keeps the birth and the identity of the mother confidential, in the Netherlands this has taken the form of a protocol drawn up by professionals which aims to keep the birth and the mother’s identity secret. This article will compare and critically discuss these developments in Germany and the Netherlands. |
Article |
Process Pluralism in Transitional-Restorative JusticeLessons from Dispute Resolution for Cultural Variations in Goals beyond Rule of Law and Democracy Development (Argentina and Chile) |
Journal | International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, Issue 1 2015 |
Keywords | transitional justice, conflict resolution, process pluralism, cultural variation, individual and collective justice |
Authors | Carrie Menkel-Meadow |
AbstractAuthor's information |
This article reviews some of the key issues in transitional justice process and institutional design, based on my research and experience working and living in several post-conflict societies, and suggests that cultural and political variations in transitional justice design, practices, and processes are necessary to accomplish plural goals. The idea of process pluralism, derived from the more general fields of conflict resolution and ‘alternative dispute resolution’ in legal contexts, is an essential part of transitional justice, where multiple processes may occur simultaneously or in sequence over time (e.g. truth and reconciliation processes, with or without amnesty, prosecutions, lustration and/or more local legal and communitarian processes), depending on both individual and collective preferences and resources. Transitional justice is itself ‘in transition’ as iterative learning has developed from assessment of different processes in different contexts (post-military dictatorships, civil wars, and international and sub-national conflicts). This article draws on examples from Argentina’s and Chile’s emergence from post-military dictatorships to describe and analyze a plurality of processes, including more formal governmental processes, but also those formed by civil society groups at sub-national levels. This article suggests that ‘democracy development’ and legalistic ‘rule of law’ goals and institutional design may not necessarily be the only desiderata in transitional justice, where more than the ‘legal’ and ‘governmental’ is at stake for more peaceful human flourishing. To use an important concept from dispute resolution, the “forum must fit the fuss”, and there are many different kinds of ‘fusses’ to be dealt with in transitional justice, at different levels of society – more than legal and governmental but also social, cultural and reparative. |
Article |
Spain: Towards a National Space Legislation and a Spanish Space Agency? |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 5 2015 |
Authors | María-del-Carmen Muñoz-Rodríguez |
Author's information |
Those who talk can be heard. Those who are allowed to talk may be listened to. This study is an attempt to give legal voice to those who cannot talk or are usually not listened to: children. This study is about the attention given to their interests, the best interests of the child. When these interests are immersed in a minority context, children may be overlooked for different reasons, including discriminatory attitudes or prejudice regarding their families. Law and its interpretation must be changed in order to include the difference. This study discusses the best interests of the child principle with special attention to its legal relevance in cases where lesbians, gays, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) are, or want to be, parents. The authoritative source for the interpretation of the principle is the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The analysis focuses on the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and its case law. The study aims to explore the Court’s approach to the best interest of the child and identify whether the principle is being consistently applied in cases involving LGBT families, given the fact that sexual orientation and gender identity are still sensitive issues in Europe. This is done by comparing these cases to cases lodged by applicants who were not identified as an LGBT person. The margin of appreciation doctrine and the lack of European consensus on sexual minorities’ rights are confronted with the urgent paramount consideration that has to be given to children’s best interests. The analysis explores whether there is room for detecting a possible Court’s biased approach towards the concept of the best interests of the child. This study challenges the Court’s decisions in the sense that the focus should not only be at the LGBT parents’ rights to private and family life, but also at the interests of their daughters and sons. This is an attempt to call upon the ECtHR and all states not only to actively fight discrimination against LGBT persons, but, ultimately, to stop interpreting the concept of the best interests of the child in an arguably biased way, and to consider the principle’s legal value in any decision, regardless of their parents’ sexual orientation, gender identity or any other distinction. |
Article |
The Impact of Growth Markets in the Downstream SectorThe Parameters for Connectivity and Services: Beyond Outer Space Law |
Journal | International Institute of Space Law, Issue 4 2015 |
Authors | Lesley Jane Smith |
Author's information |
Article |
Goodwill/Intangibles Accounting Rules, Earnings Management, and Competition |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 1 2015 |
Keywords | fraud, mergers and acquisitions, Games economic psychology, regulation, goodwill and intangibles |
Authors | Michael I.C. Nwogugu |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Intangible assets account for 60%-75% of the market capitalization value in most developed stock markets around the world. The US GAAP and IFRS Goodwill and Intangibles accounting regulations (ASC 805, Business Combinations; ASC 350, Goodwill and Intangible Assets; IFRS-3R, Business Combinations; and IAS 38, Accounting for Intangible Assets) are inefficient and create potentially harmful psychological biases. These regulations facilitate earnings management and money laundering, reduce competition within industries, and are likely to increase the incidence of fraud and misconduct. This article introduces a new goodwill/intangibles disclosure/accounting model that can reduce the incidence of fraud, information asymmetry, moral hazard, adverse selection, and inaccuracy. The article also introduces new economic psychological theories that can explain fraud, misconduct, and non-compliance arising from the implementation of the goodwill/intangibles accounting rules. |
Article |
Un-Constitutionality of the Dodd-Frank Act |
Journal | European Journal of Law Reform, Issue 1 2015 |
Keywords | Dodd-Frank Act, enforcement games, systemic risk, financial services regulation, constitutional law |
Authors | Michael I.C. Nwogugu |
AbstractAuthor's information |
‘Restoring American Financial Stability Act’ of 2010 (‘RAFSA’ or the ‘Dodd-Frank Act’) was the first set of statutes in any country that attempted to simultaneously address the Global Financial Crisis, the national securities law framework, the structure of the executive branch of the federal government, and delegation of powers to federal government agencies (to the detriment of state governments). Other countries have enacted statutes that are similar to RAFSA. However, RAFSA and similar statutes in many countries are inefficient and have failed to address the fundamental problems in financial systems, and parts of RAFSA are unconstitutional. |