-
Question
Must Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2003/109 be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘resources’, which is referred to in that provision, concerns only the ‘own resources’ of the applicant for long-term resident status or whether this concept also covers the resources made available to that applicant by a third party and, if so, is a commitment of cost bearing entered into by that third party sufficient to provide proof that the applicant has stable, regular and sufficient resources within the meaning of that provision?
-
Ruling
Article 5(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘resources’ referred to in that provision does not concern solely the ‘own resources’ of the applicant for long-term resident status, but may also cover the resources made available to that applicant by a third party provided that, in the light of the individual circumstances of the applicant concerned, they are considered to be stable, regular and sufficient.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004004023
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 3 October 2019, case C-302/18 (X), Work and residence permitX – v – Belgische Staat, Belgian case |
Keywords | Work and residence permit |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004004023 |
Show PDF Show fullscreen Abstract Statistics Citation |
This article has been viewed times. |
This article been downloaded 0 times. |
Suggested citation
, "ECJ 3 October 2019, case C-302/18 (X), Work and residence permit", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2019):279-279
, "ECJ 3 October 2019, case C-302/18 (X), Work and residence permit", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2019):279-279
|
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Contents