GENERAL NOTICE

In January 2025, this online platform will be integrated into Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), after which this platform will be discontinued. From that moment on, this URL will automatically redirect to Boomportaal.

Search articles of European Employment Law Cases
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003019

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open
Pending Cases

Case C-367/23, Working Time, Fundamental Rights

EA – v – Artemis security SAS, reference lodged by the Cour de cassation (France) on 9 June 2023
Keywords Working Time, Fundamental Rights
DOI 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003019
Show PDF Show fullscreen
Statistics Citation
This article has been viewed times.
This article been downloaded 0 times.
Suggested citation
, "Case C-367/23, Working Time, Fundamental Rights", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):154-155
Download RIS Download BibTex

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Does Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time fulfil the conditions for it to have direct effect and be relied on by a worker in a dispute concerning that worker?

      2. Must Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation or practices under which, in the event of a failure to comply with the provisions adopted to implement the measures necessary for the free assessment of a worker’s health, the worker’s right to compensation is subject to proof of the damage which would have resulted from that breach?


Print this article